neural information processing systemsSynthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Designing Cell-Type-Specific Promoter Sequences Using Conservative Model-Based Optimization
Aniketh Janardhan ReddyiD, Xinyang GengiD, Michael H. HerschliD, Sathvik Kolli, Aviral Kumar, Patrick D. HsuiD, Sergey LevineiD, Nilah M. IoannidisiD
Abstract
Gene therapies have the potential to treat disease by delivering therapeutic genetic cargo to disease-associated cells. One limitation to their widespread use is the lack of short regulatory sequences, or promoters, that differentially induce the expression of delivered genetic cargo in target cells, minimizing side effects in other cell types. Such cell-type-specific promoters are difficult to discover using existing methods, requiring either manual curation or access to large datasets of promoter-driven expression from both targeted and untargeted cells. Model-based optimization (MBO) has emerged as an effective method to design biological sequences in an automated manner, and has recently been used in promoter design methods. However, these methods have only been tested using large training datasets that are expensive to collect, and focus on designing promoters for markedly different cell types, overlooking the complexities associated with designing promoters for closely related cell types that share similar regulatory features. Therefore, we introduce a comprehensive framework for utilizing MBO to design promoters in a data-efficient manner, with an emphasis on discovering promoters for similar cell types. We use conservative objective models (COMs) for MBO and highlight practical considerations such as best practices for improving sequence diversity, getting estimates of model uncertainty, and choosing the optimal set of sequences for experimental validation. Using three relatively similar blood cancer cell lines (Jurkat, K562, and THP1), we show that our approach discovers many novel cell-type-specific promoters after experimentally validating the designed sequences. For K562 cells, in particular, we discover a promoter that has 75.85% higher cell-type-specificity than the best promoter from the initial dataset used to train our models.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: optimal transport
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Strategies for effectively modelling promoter-driven gene expression using transfer learning
Aniketh Janardhan Reddy, Michael H. Herschl, … Nilah M. Ioannidis·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2023
- RegDesign-Bench: Benchmarking computational methods for cell-type-specific regulatory DNA design
Jiaying Xu, Zekun Guo, … Pan Deng·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- Model-driven generation of artificial yeast promoters
C. Smolke, B. Kotopka·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019
- Deep learning-guided design of cell type-specific AAV promoters
Sean K. Wang, Boxiong Deng, … Sui Wang·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2026
- Machine-guided design of synthetic cell type-specific cis-regulatory elements
Sager J. Gosai, Rodrigo I. Castro, … Ryan Tewhey·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2023
- Language model generates cis-regulatory elements across prokaryotes
Yan Xia, Jinyuan Sun, … Yi‐Xin Huo·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2024