Development of an electronic decision aid tool to facilitate mainstream genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients
Kristen Mahoney ShannoniD, Devanshi PateliD, Jessica Jonas, Erica L. Blouch, Stephanie R. HicksiD, Mackenzie WootersiD, Meredith Seidel, Carly F. Grant, Margaret M. EmmetiD, Daniel C. ChungiD, Karen SepuchaiD
Abstract
BackgroundMultigene panel testing is an important component of cancer treatment plans and risk assessment, but there are many different panel options and choosing the most appropriate panel can be challenging for healthcare providers and patients. Electronic tools have been proposed to help patients make informed decisions about which gene panel to choose by considering their preferences and priorities. Materials and MethodsAn electronic decision aid tool was developed in line with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) collaboration. The multidisciplinary project team collaborated with an external healthcare communications agency and the MGH Cancer Center patient family advisory committee (PFAC) to develop the decision aid. Surveys of genetic counselors and patients were used to scope the content, and alpha testing was used to refine the design and content. ResultsSurveys of genetic counselors (n=12) and patients (n=228) identified common themes in discussing panel size and strategies for helping patients decide between panels and in identifying confusing terms for patients and distribution of patients choices. The decision aid, organized into two major sections, provides educational text, graphics and videos to guide patients through the decision-making process. Alpha testing feedback from the PFAC (n=4), genetic counselors (n=3) and a group of lay people (n=8) identified areas to improve navigation, simplify wording and improve layout. ConclusionThe decision aid developed in this study has the potential to facilitate informed decision-making by patients regarding cancer genetic testing. The distinctive feature of this decision aid is that it addresses the specific question of which multigene panel may be most suitable for the patient. Its acceptability and effectiveness will be evaluated in future studies. Implications for PracticeThe use of multigene panel testing in oncology has increased significantly, but selecting the most appropriate panel for each patient can be challenging for healthcare providers and patients. The complexity and heterogeneity of the data generated by these tests, coupled with the potential psychological, emotional, and financial impacts, make informed consent a critical component of the genetic testing process. With the expansion of germline genetic testing, the traditional model of pre-test informed consent by a genetic counselor may no longer be scalable. Electronic decision aids have shown promise in increasing patient knowledge and empowerment in the shared decision-making process. The development of a comprehensive electronic tool can facilitate patient education while maximizing patient autonomy, allowing for more personalized and informed decisions about which gene panel to choose.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Validation of a guidelines-based digital tool to assess the need for germline cancer genetic testing
Callan D. Russell, Ashley Daley, … Colleen A. Caleshu·Hereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Genetic testing in cancer: a systematic review of patient reported measures
Kelsie Raspin, Daisy Nowakowski, … Jessica K. Roydhouse·medRxiv·Jul 7, 2025
- Title: A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2): study protocol
Evelyn Mastaglio, Brian Lee Egleston, … Angela R. Bradbury·BMC CancerPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2026
- Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients
Angela George, Daniel Riddell, … Mainstreaming Cancer Genetics (MCG) Programme·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2016
- A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2)
Kimberley T. Lee, Brian Lee Egleston, … eREACH2 Group·Journal of Clinical OncologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- eREACH: A randomized trial of digital alternatives to genetic counseling for metastatic cancer
Kimberley T. Lee, Brian Lee Egleston, … Angela R. Bradbury·medRxiv·Oct 1, 2025