Gene Length And Detection Bias In Single Cell RNA Sequencing Protocols
Abstract
Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has rapidly gained popularity for profiling transcriptomes of hundreds to thousands of single cells. This technology has led to the discovery of novel cell types and revealed insights into the development of complex tissues. However, many technical challenges need to be overcome during data generation. Due to minute amounts of starting material, samples undergo extensive amplification, increasing technical variability. A solution for mitigating amplification biases is to include Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs), which tag individual molecules. Transcript abundances are then estimated from the number of unique UMIs aligning to a specific gene and PCR duplicates resulting in copies of the UMI are not included in expression estimates. Here we investigate the effect of gene length bias in scRNA-Seq across a variety of datasets differing in terms of capture technology, library preparation, cell types and species. We find that scRNA-seq datasets that have been sequenced using a full-length transcript protocol exhibit gene length bias akin to bulk RNA-seq data. Specifically, shorter genes tend to have lower counts and a higher rate of dropout. In contrast, protocols that include UMIs do not exhibit gene length bias, and have a mostly uniform rate of dropout across genes of varying length. Across four different scRNA-Seq datasets profiling mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), we found the subset of genes that are only detected in the UMI datasets tended to be shorter, while the subset of genes detected only in the full-length datasets tended to be longer. We briefly discuss the role of these genes in the context of differential expression testing and GO analysis. In addition, despite clear differences between UMI and full-length transcript data, we illustrate that full-length and UMI data can be combined to reveal underlying biology influencing expression of mESCs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 74
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Batch effects and the effective design of single-cell gene expression studies
Po-Yuan Tung, John D Blischak, … Yoav Gilad·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2017
- Power Analysis of Single Cell RNA‐Sequencing Experiments
Valentine Svensson, Kedar N Natarajan, … Sarah A Teichmann·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2016
- Quantile normalization of single-cell RNA-seq read counts without unique molecular identifiers
F. William Townes, Rafael A. Irizarry·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2020
- Characterizing and Mitigating Protocol-Dependent Gene Expression Bias in 3' and 5' Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
Valeryia Shydlouskaya, S. M. Mansour Haeryfar, Tallulah S. Andrews·Frontiers in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2026
- Missing Data and Technical Variability in Single-Cell RNA- Sequencing Experiments
Stephanie C. Hicks, F. William Townes, … Rafael A. Irizarry·BiostatisticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2017
- Impact Of Sequencing Depth And Read Length On Single Cell RNA Sequencing Data: Lessons From T Cells
Simone Rizzetto, Auda A. Eltahla, … Fabio Luciani·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 2, 2017