Semi-supervised Bayesian integration of multiple spatial proteomics datasets
Stephen D. ColemaniD, Lisa M. BreckelsiD, Ross F. WalleriD, Kathryn Susan LilleyiD, Chris WallaceiD, Oliver M. CrookiD, Paul KirkiD
Abstract
The subcellular localisation of proteins is a key determinant of their function. High-throughput analyses of these localisations can be performed using mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics, which enables us to examine the localisation and relocalisation of proteins. Furthermore, complementary data sources can provide additional sources of functional or localisation information. Examples include protein annotations and other high-throughput omic assays. Integrating these modalities can provide new insights as well as additional confidence in results, but existing approaches for integrative analyses of spatial proteomics datasets are limited in the types of data they can integrate and do not quantify uncertainty. Here we propose a semi-supervised Bayesian approach to integrate spatial proteomics datasets with other data sources, to improve the inference of protein sub-cellular localisation. We demonstrate our approach outperforms other transfer-learning methods and has greater flexibility in the data it can model. To demonstrate the flexibility of our approach, we apply our method to integrate spatial proteomics data generated for the parasite Toxoplasma gondii with time-course gene expression data generated over its cell cycle. Our findings suggest that proteins linked to invasion organelles are associated with expression programs that peak at the end of the first cell-cycle. Furthermore, this integrative analysis divides the dense granule proteins into heterogeneous populations suggestive of potentially different functions. Our method is disseminated via the mdir R package available on the lead authors Github. Author summaryProteins are located in subcellular environments to ensure that they are near their interaction partners and occur in the correct biochemical environment to function. Where a protein is located can be determined from a number of data sources. To integrate diverse datasets together we develop an integrative Bayesian model to combine the information from several datasets in a principled manner. We learn how similar the dataset are as part of the modelling process and demonstrate the benefits of integrating mass-spectrometry based spatial proteomics data with timecourse gene-expression datasets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Field percentile
- 44th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Bayesian Mixture Modelling Approach For Spatial Proteomics
Oliver M. Crook, Claire M. Mulvey, … Laurent Gatto·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2018
- Learning from heterogeneous data sources: an application in spatial proteomics
Lisa M Breckels, Sean Holden, … Laurent Gatto·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2016
- A semi-supervised Bayesian approach for simultaneous protein sub-cellular localisation assignment and novelty detection
Oliver M. Crook, Aikaterini Geladaki, … Paul Kirk·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2020
- Inferring differential subcellular localisation in comparative spatial proteomics using BANDLE
Oliver M. Crook, Colin T. R. Davies, … Kathryn Susan Lilley·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2021
- Assessing sub-cellular resolution in spatial proteomics experiments
Laurent Gatto, Lisa M. Breckels, Kathryn Susan Lilley·Current Opinion in Chemical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2018
- PEELing: an integrated and user-centric platform for spatially-resolved proteomics data analysis
Xi Peng, Jody Clements, … Jun Li·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2025