henhaobio
Sign in

PLoS Computational BiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

A semi-supervised Bayesian approach for simultaneous protein sub-cellular localisation assignment and novelty detection

Oliver M. CrookiD, Aikaterini GeladakiiD, Daniel J. H. NightingaleiD, Owen L. VennardiD, Kathryn Susan LilleyiD, Laurent GattoiD, Paul KirkiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The cell is compartmentalised into complex micro-environments allowing an array of specialised biological processes to be carried out in synchrony. Determining a proteins sub-cellular localisation to one or more of these compartments can therefore be a first step in determining its function. High-throughput and high-accuracy mass spectrometry-based sub-cellular proteomic methods can now shed light on the localisation of thousands of proteins at once. Machine learning algorithms are then typically employed to make protein-organelle assignments. However, these algorithms are limited by insufficient and incomplete annotation. We propose a semi-supervised Bayesian approach to novelty detection, allowing the discovery of additional, previously unannotated sub-cellular niches. Inference in our model is performed in a Bayesian framework, allowing us to quantify uncertainty in the allocation of proteins to new sub-cellular niches, as well as in the number of newly discovered compartments. We apply our approach across 10 mass spectrometry based spatial proteomic datasets, representing a diverse range of experimental protocols. Application of our approach to hyper LOPIT datasets validates its utility by recovering enrichment with chromatin-associated proteins without annotation and uncovers sub-nuclear compartmentalisation which was not identified in the original analysis. Moreover, using sub-cellular proteomics data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we uncover a novel group of proteins trafficking from the ER to the early Golgi apparatus. Overall, we demonstrate the potential for novelty detection to yield biologically relevant niches that are missed by current approaches.

Citations
24
FWCI
1.72
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCrook '18Coleman '25Breckels '16Parsons '26Crook '21Zhang '25
77% semantic matchSystems Biology
Oliver M. Crook, Claire M. Mulvey, Paul Kirk+2 more·PLoS Computational Biology·Nov 27, 2018· 63 citations