Sign in
NeuroscienceNeuroImage
Peer-reviewed journal article

The value of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition in predicting motor skill improvement driven by action observation

Arturo NuaraiD, Maria Chiara BazziniiD, Pasquale CardellicchioiD, Emilia ScalonaiD, Doriana De MarcoiD, Giacomo RizzolattiiD, Maddalena Fabbri‐DestroiD, Pietro AvanziniiD

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEAction observation can sustain motor skill improvement. At the neurophysiological level, action observation affects the excitability of the motor cortices, as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, whether the cortical modulations induced by action observation may explain the amount of motor improvement driven by action observation training (AOT) remains to be addressed. METHODSWe conducted a two-phase study involving 40 volunteers. First, we assessed the effect of action observation on corticospinal excitability (amplitude of motor evoked potentials), short-interval intracortical inhibition, and transcallosal inhibition (ipsilateral silent period). Subsequently, a randomized-controlled design was applied, with AOT participants asked to observe and then execute, as quickly as possible, a right-hand dexterity task six consecutive times, whereas controls had to observe a no-action video before performing the same task. RESULTSAOT participants showed greater performance improvement relative to controls. The amount of improvement in the AOT group was predicted by the amplitude of corticospinal modulation during action observation and even more by the amount of intracortical inhibition induced by action observation. Importantly, these relations were found specifically for the AOT group and not for the controls. CONCLUSIONSIn this study, we identified the neurophysiological signatures associated with, and potentially sustaining, the outcome of AOT. Intracortical inhibition driven by action observation plays a major role. These findings elucidate the cortical mechanisms underlying AOT efficacy and open to predictive assessments for the identification of potential responders to AOT, informing the rehabilitative treatment individualization.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
24
FWCI
4.72
Field percentile
top 5%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWaltzing '26Chye '22Jerjian '19Valappil '24McCurdy '26Yadav '24
82% semantic matchNeuroscience