Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Active Motor Preparation Drives Corticospinal Facilitation during Interception Planning
Justin R. McCurdyiD, Brendan Jarvis, Emma Whitman, Krithi Ariga, Asher Khan, Deborah A. BaranyiD
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 39%
Abstract
Intercepting a moving target requires integrating visual motion information with motor preparation, yet how active motor preparation and gaze strategy jointly shape corticospinal excitability during interception planning remains unclear. We applied single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex to probe corticospinal excitability while participants either prepared to intercept a moving target or passively viewed its motion. Targets moved at one of two speeds, and participants judged target speed relative to a reference after each trial. Across blocks, participants were instructed to either smoothly pursue the target or fixate their eyes on the interception zone. Motor-evoked potentials were elicited at baseline, after task instruction, early during target motion, or shortly before target arrival. Task and gaze strategy interacted to influence both perceptual judgments and corticospinal excitability. Preparing to intercept produced a robust facilitation of corticospinal excitability immediately before movement onset, regardless of gaze strategy. In contrast, corticospinal excitability during passive viewing did not differ from baseline. Smooth pursuit improved perceptual accuracy and reduced interception timing error compared with fixation but did not independently influence corticospinal facilitation. These findings demonstrate that active motor preparation is the primary determinant of the transition to a state of facilitated excitability during interception planning, whereas eye movements modulate perceptual estimates and support behavioral performance. New & NoteworthyThis study dissociates the contributions of visual tracking, eye movements, and active motor preparation to corticospinal excitability during interception. Here, we show that corticospinal facilitation emerges primarily when an action is planned, whereas passive viewing remains at baseline despite identical visual input. Smooth pursuit enhanced perceptual accuracy and interception timing but had a limited effect on corticospinal excitability, highlighting active motor preparation as the key driver of corticospinal output.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Corticospinal excitability during timed interception depends on the speed of the moving target
Justin R. McCurdy, Daniel Zlatopolsky, … Deborah A. Barany·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2025
- Timecourse of corticospinal excitability for observed action: evidence of early suppression followed by return to baseline without facilitation
Baptiste M Waltzing, Marcos Moreno Verdú, … Robert M. Hardwick·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Premovement suppression of corticospinal excitability may be a necessary part of movement preparation
Jaime Ibáñez, Ricci Hannah, … John C. Rothwell·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2019
- Premovement inhibition protects motor actions from interference
Aaron N. McInnes, Ottmar V. Lipp, … Welber Marinovic·bioRxiv·Apr 26, 2021
- Motor training strengthens corticospinal suppression during movement preparation
Pierre Vassiliadis, Gérard Derosière, … Julie Duqué·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2020
- The value of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition in predicting motor skill improvement driven by action observation
Arturo Nuara, Maria Chiara Bazzini, … Pietro Avanzini·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2022