No genome-wide correlations and little shared genetic architecture between reproductive life-history traits and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer risk
Euan A. YoungiD, E. Yagmur ErteniD, Erik PostmaiD, Virpi LummaaiD, Bert van der VegtiD, Geertruida H. de BockiD, Hannah L. DugdaleiD
Abstract
Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC) is one of the most prevalent cancers, but the evolutionary processes shaping genetic variation in ER+ BC risk are poorly understood. Both evolutionary life-history theory and evidence from studies of individual ER+ BC risk variants suggest that increased genetic ER+ BC risk is associated with faster maturation, earlier reproduction, and/or increased reproductive success (i.e., there is a trade-off), but it is unclear how well this pattern is replicated when considering the polygenic architecture of these traits after controlling for potential biases. Here, we estimate genome-wide genetic correlations between ER+ BC risk and three reproductive traits (age at menarche, age at first birth, and the number of children) using genomic restricted maximum-likelihood analyses on Lifelines biobank data and linkage disequilibrium score regressions on population and family-based genome-wide association study data. Regardless of the data or method used, genetic correlations were low and not statistically significant. Further analyses decomposing genome-wide genetic variance into local regions detected only three loci exhibiting significant pleiotropy between ER+ BC risk and age at menarche, suggesting little shared genetic architecture between ER+ BC risk and reproductive traits. Thus, the role of life-history trade-offs in shaping ER+ BC risk in European populations appears, at most, small, and the evolutionary processes giving rise to this life-threatening disease remain unclear. Future studies could examine the impact of evolutionary mismatches in shaping ER+ BC risk, where conducting longitudinal studies on populations transitioning to reproductive patterns observed in contemporary European populations would be most useful.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 36%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estrogen interactions with breast cancer risk variants in regulatory DNA
Ibtihal Elfaki, Laura N. Kellman, … Paul A. Khavari·medRxiv·Sep 11, 2026
- Genetic and Cellular Architecture of Breast Cancer Risk Across Ancestries
James Li, Maria Zanti, … Haoyu Zhang·JNCI Cancer SpectrumPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2026
- Retrospective analysis of The Two Sister Study using haplotype-based association testing to identify loci associated with early-onset breast cancer
James R. Gilbert, James Cray, … Gregory M. Cooper·medRxiv·Dec 4, 2020
- Genomic risk prediction for breast cancer in older women
Paul A Lacaze, Andrew Bakshi, … John J. McNeil·CancersPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2021
- Genetic Architecture of Reproduction and Longevity in Historical Dutch Cohorts
Richard Meitern, Peeter Hõrak·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2026
- Imprint of parity and age at first birth on the genomic landscape of subsequent breast cancer
B. Nguyen, D. Venet, … C. Sotiriou·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2018