JNCI Cancer SpectrumGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Genetic and Cellular Architecture of Breast Cancer Risk Across Ancestries
James LiiD, Maria ZantiiD, Jacob WilliamsiD, Om B. JahagirdariD, Guochong JiaiD, Alistair Turcan, Qiang HuiD, Jean‐Tristan BrandenburgiD, Yàn LiiD, Weang-Kee HoiD, Jingmei LiiD, José Patricio MirandaiD, Devika GodboleiD, Julie‐Alexia DiasiD, Xiaomeng ZhangiD, Leila DorlingiD, Wenlong Carl CheniD, Nicholas James BoddickeriD, Ying WangiD, Alicia R. MartiniD, Yan ZhangiD, Joe DennisiD, Esther M. JohniD, Gabriela Torres-Mejı́aiD, Lawrence H Kushi, , Haoyu ZhangiD
Abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 susceptibility loci, but most studies are dominated by European and East Asian populations. MethodsWe analyzed breast cancer GWAS summary statistics from African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), European (EUR), and Hispanic/Latina (H/L) samples (159,297 cases and 212,102 controls). We estimated logit-scale SNP-based heritability, polygenicity, and cross-ancestry genetic correlation, partitioned heritability across functional annotations, and integrated GWAS results with the Tabula Sapiens single-cell atlas using scDRS+. ResultsThe logit-scale heritability of breast cancer ranged from h2 =0.47 (SE = 0.07) in EAS to AFR h2 =0.61 (SE = 0.10), with no significant differences across ancestries (p=0.63). The model-implied number of non-null susceptibility SNPs in the sparse normal-mixture effect-size model also varied from 4,446 (SE = 3,100) in EAS to 8,308 (SE = 2,751) in AFR, but differences were not significant across ancestries (p=0.55). Cross-sample genetic correlations varied, with the strongest correlation between EUR and EAS ({rho} = 0.79, SE = 0.08) and weakest between AFR and H/L ({rho} = 0.26, SE = 0.24). Regulatory annotations were enriched for breast cancer heritability across samples. Integration with single-cell expression profiles implicated ancestry-shared associations with innate immune, secretory epithelial, and stromal cell types. ConclusionThese results indicate substantial cross-ancestry sharing of breast cancer polygenic architecture, highlight a consistent contribution of regulatory variation, and identify convergent cellular contexts that motivate functional follow-up and inform expectations for the transferability and attainable performance of common-variant risk prediction across populations.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: fine-mapping
- approach: statistical model
- approach: matrix factorization
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deciphering the Genomic architecture of three major Cancers in African-Ancestry Populations
David Enoma, Anthony Micheal Idedia, … Olubanke Olujoke Ogunlana·medRxiv·Dec 22, 2025
- Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers
Xia Jiang, Hilary K. Finucane, … Patricia A. Ganz·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2019
- A framework for transcriptome-wide association studies in breast cancer in diverse study populations
A. Bhattacharya, M. Garcia-Closas, … M. I. Love·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2019
- Identification of Novel Common Breast Cancer Risk Variants in Latinas at the 6q25 Locus
Joshua Hoffman, Laura Fejerman, … Elad Ziv·Breast Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2019
- The clinical and molecular landscape of breast cancer in women of African and South Asian ancestry
Graeme J. Thorn, Emanuela Gadaleta, … Claude Chelala·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2025
- On Cross-ancestry Cancer Polygenic Risk Scores
Lars G. Fritsche, Ying Ma, … Bhramar Mukherjee·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2021