The Functional False Discovery Rate with Applications to Genomics
Abstract
The false discovery rate measures the proportion of false discoveries among a set of hypothesis tests called significant. This quantity is typically estimated based on p-values or test statistics. In some scenarios, there is additional information available that may be used to more accurately estimate the false discovery rate. We develop a new framework for formulating and estimating false discovery rates and q-values when an additional piece of information, which we call an \"informative variable\", is available. For a given test, the informative variable provides information about the prior probability a null hypothesis is true or the power of that particular test. The false discovery rate is then treated as a function of this informative variable. We consider two applications in genomics. Our first is a genetics of gene expression (eQTL) experiment in yeast where every genetic marker and gene expression trait pair are tested for associations. The informative variable in this case is the distance between each genetic marker and gene. Our second application is to detect differentially expressed genes in an RNA-seq study carried out in mice. The informative variable in this study is the per-gene read depth. The framework we develop is quite general, and it should be useful in a broad range of scientific applications.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 60
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A direct approach to estimating false discovery rates conditional on covariates
Simina Maria Boca, Jeffrey T. Leek·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2018
- Post-selection Inference Following Aggregate Level Hypothesis Testing in Large Scale Genomic Data
Ruth Heller, Nilanjan Chatterjee, … Jianxin Shi·Journal of the American Statistical AssociationPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2017
- Power, false discovery rate and Winner’s Curse in eQTL studies
Qin Qin Huang, Scott C. Ritchie, … Michael Inouye·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2018
- A practical guide to methods controlling false discoveries in computational biology
Keegan D. Korthauer, Patrick K. Kimes, … Stephanie C. Hicks·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2019
- False Discovery Rates: A New Deal.
Matthew Stephens·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2016
- Powerful and interpretable control of false discoveries in differential expression studies
Nicolas Enjalbert-Courrech, Pierre Neuvial·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2022