Powerful and interpretable control of false discoveries in differential expression studies
Abstract
MotivationThe standard approach for statistical inference in differential expression (DE) analyses is to control the False Discovery Rate (FDR). However, controlling the FDR does not in fact imply that the proportion of false discoveries is upper bounded. Moreover, no statistical guarantee can be given on subsets of genes selected by FDR thresholding. These known limitations are overcome by post hoc inference, which provides guarantees of the number of proportion of false discoveries among arbitrary gene selections. However, post hoc inference methods are not yet widely used for DE studies. ResultsIn this paper, we demonstrate the relevance and illustrate the performance of adaptive interpolation-based post hoc methods for DE studies. First, we formalize the use of permutation-based methods to obtain sharp confidence bounds that are adaptive to the dependence between genes. Then, we introduce a generic linear time algorithm for computing post hoc bounds, making these bounds applicable to large-scale DE studies. The use of the resulting Adaptive Simes bound is illustrated on a RNA sequencing study. Comprehensive numerical experiments based on real microarray and RNA sequencing data demonstrate the statistical performance of the method. AvailabilityA cross-platform open source implementation within the R package sanssouci is available at https://pneuvial.github.io/sanssouci/.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improving the sensitivity of differential-expression analyses for under-powered RNA-seq experiments
Alex T. Kalinka·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2020
- A large-sample crisis? Exaggerated false positives by popular differential expression methods
Yumei Li, Xinzhou Ge, … Jingyi Jessica Li·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2022
- dearseq: a variance component score test for RNA-Seq differential analysis that effectively controls the false discovery rate
Marine Gauthier, Denis M. Agniel, … Boris P. Hejblum·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2020
- Controlling False Positive Rates in Methods for Differential Gene Expression Analysis using RNA-Seq Data
David M Rocke, Luyao Ruan, … Sharon Aviran·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2015
- Excess False Positive Rates in Methods for Differential Gene Expression Analysis using RNA-Seq Data
David M Rocke, Luyao Ruan, … Sharon Aviran·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2015
- Not every gene is special: one simple rule to control the false discovery rate when analysing high-throughput sequencing data
Scott J Dos Santos, Andreea C. Murariu, … Gregory Brian Gloor·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2025