Addressing confounding artifacts in reconstruction of gene co-expression networks
Princy ParsanaiD, Claire Ruberman, Andrew E. JaffeiD, Michael C. SchatziD, Alexis J. BattleiD, Jeffrey T. LeekiD
Abstract
BackgroundGene co-expression networks capture diverse biological relationships between genes, and are important tools in predicting gene function and understanding disease mechanisms. Functional interactions between genes have not been fully characterized for most organisms, and therefore reconstruction of gene co-expression networks has been of common interest in a variety of settings. However, methods routinely used for reconstruction of gene co-expression networks do not account for confounding artifacts known to affect high dimensional gene expression measurements.\n\nResultsIn this study, we show that artifacts such as batch effects in gene expression data confound commonly used network reconstruction algorithms. Both theoretically and empirically, we demonstrate that removing the effects of top principal components from gene expression measurements prior to network inference can reduce false discoveries, especially when well annotated technical covariates are not available. Using expression data from the GTEx project in multiple tissues and hundreds of individuals, we show that this latent factor residualization approach often reduces false discoveries in the reconstructed networks.\n\nConclusionNetwork reconstruction is susceptible to confounders that affect measurements of gene expression. Even controlling for major individual known technical covariates fails to fully eliminate confounding variation from the data. In studies where a wide range of annotated technical factors are measured and available, correcting gene expression data with multiple covariates can also improve network reconstruction, but such extensive annotations are not always available. Our study shows that principal component correction, which does not depend on study design or annotation of all relevant confounders, removes patterns of artifactual variation and improves network reconstruction in both simulated data, and gene expression data from GTEx project. We have implemented our PC correction approach in the Bioconductor package sva which can be used prior to network reconstruction with a range of methods.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 103
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of confound adjustment methods in the construction of gene co-expression networks
Alanna C. Cote, Hannah E. Young, Laura M. Huckins·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2022
- Higher-order correction of persistent batch effects in correlation networks
Soel Micheletti, Daniel Schlauch, … Marouen Ben Guebila·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- Co-expression analysis is biased by a mean-correlation relationship
Yi Wang, Stephanie C. Hicks, Kasper D. Hansen·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2020
- COGENT: evaluating the consistency of gene co-expression networks
Lyuba V. Bozhilova, Javier Pardo-Diaz, … Charlotte Mary Deane·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2020
- Adjustment of spurious correlations in co-expression measurements from RNA-Sequencing data
Ping‐Han Hsieh, Camila M. Lopes‐Ramos, … Marieke L. Kuijjer·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2023
- Evaluation of critical data processing steps for reliable prediction of gene co-expression from large collections of RNA-seq data
Alexis Vandenbon·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2022