bioRxivPathologyPreprint
SortIT - A Tool For Assessing Observer Variability And Creating Ground Truth Image Classification Datasets
Wataru UegamiiD, Tom BissoniD, Ethan N. OkoshiiD, Frederico Gaia Costa da SilvaiD, Jijgee MunkhdelgeriD, Kris LamiiD, Norman ZerbeiD, Andrey BychkoviD, Junya FukuokaiD
Abstract
Interobserver variability in pathological assessments is a well-recognized challenge that impacts diagnostic reliability and disease understanding. This variability exists across many subspecialties due to the subjective nature of evaluations. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to whole slide images has potential to standardize procedures and reduce variability in pathology, but transitioning to these technologies does not guarantee improvement. Establishing reliable ground truth datasets with consensus annotations is crucial for developing robust AI solutions. We introduce SortIT, an open-source web application that facilitates systematic creation and evaluation of ground truth image tile annotations. SortIT enables multiple annotators to independently label tiles, with flexible user permission controls. Annotated data can be exported for statistical analysis of observer variation and for creating ground truth datasets from consensus tiles. We outline protocols using SortIT for several use cases: (1) mitosis segmentation in tumor regions, (2) evaluating AI solutions for prostate cancer grading by comparing to expert consensus, and (3) granuloma classification by annotating discriminative tile-level features. Key strengths of SortIT lies in its ease of deployment, making it accessible and usable for a wide range of users. Overall, SortIT provides a valuable tool to establish high-quality ground truth datasets and comprehensively assess observer variability. Critical evaluation of ground truth quality using systematic annotation methodologies is crucial for developing accurate and generalizable diagnostic AI tools. Its open-source nature facilitates community adoption and further development.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AnnotateAnyCell: Open-Source AI Framework for Efficient Annotation in Digital Pathology
Shourya Verma, Aditya Malusare, … Nadia A. Lanman·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2025
- VrySure: A Multi-Task AI Scientific Fraud Detection Platform for Identifying Manipulated and AI-Generated Biomedical Research Images
Jia Sun, Bingrui Li, Raghu Kalluri·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2026
- Evaluating reproducibility of AI algorithms in digital pathology with DAPPER
Andrea Bizzego, Nicole Bussola, … Cesare Furlanello·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2019
- DeepScope: Nonintrusive Whole Slide Saliency Annotation and Prediction from Pathologists at the Microscope
A. J. Schaumberg, S. J. Sirintrapun, … T. J. Fuchs·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2017
- DIANNE: Segmentation-Free Localization of Histology Differential Attributes
Sergii Domanskyi, Jill Carol Rubinstein, … Jeffrey H. Chuang·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2026
- A Web/Cloud based Digital Pathology Platform Framework for AI Development and Deployment
Zeynettin Akkus, Bryan J. Dangott, Aziza Nassar·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2022