From linear to nonlinear gait measures: validity of a multi-view markerless motion capture system
Baptiste PerthuyiD, Hugues VinzantiD, Clement Brifault, Nicolas LefèvreiD, Alexandre Dalibot, Sofiane RamdaniiD, Leslie Marion DeckeriD
Abstract
Markerless motion capture offers a practical alternative to marker-based optoelectronic systems, yet validation studies have focused almost exclusively on linear gait measures. Nonlinear measures of gait dynamics, sensitive to the fine temporal structure of locomotor signals, remain unvalidated in markerless systems. This study assessed the concurrent validity of a three-camera markerless system against a 15-camera optoelectronic system across four treadmill speeds in 22 healthy adults. Inter-system agreement was evaluated for spatiotemporal parameters (mean, variability, detrended fluctuation analysis [DFA] scaling exponents) and for joint angle and trunk acceleration time series (maximum Lyapunov exponents, sample entropy, Attractor Complexity Index [ACI]). Temporal measures reached near-perfect agreement, and spatial measures showed good to excellent agreement with small speed-dependent positive biases. Sagittal-plane joint kinematic waveforms were compared using statistical parametric mapping, with root-mean-square error (RMSE) reported for significant intervals. Agreement was best at the hip, with knee and ankle showing comparable, higher error (RMSE: 1.2-3.0{degrees} hip, 3.7-5.5{degrees} knee and 3.8-5.1{degrees} ankle). ACI demonstrated moderate to good agreement across all joints and good agreement across trunk acceleration directions. Most DFA scaling exponents for step-based series supported group-level comparisons: both measures are usable for markerless assessment of gait's nonlinear dynamics. Maximum Lyapunov exponents and sample entropy showed lower absolute agreement: at the hip and knee, they preserved inter-individual ranking and remained usable for within-system group comparisons, but agreement collapsed at the ankle and for trunk sample entropy, indicating these measures still need refinement. These findings define a tiered, measure-specific scope for markerless gait analysis, extending validation beyond spatiotemporal parameters.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture
R. M. Kanko, E. K. Laende, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020
- Inter-session repeatability of markerless motion capture gait kinematics
R. M. Kanko, E. Laende, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2020
- Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements
K. Song, T. J. Hullfish, … J. R. Baxter·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2023
- A Low-Cost Markerless motion capture system to automate Functional Gait Assessment: Feasibility Study
Osman Darici, Chanel Cabak, Jeremy D. Wong·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2026
- Comparison of concurrent and asynchronous running kinematics and kinetics from marker-based motion capture and markerless motion capture under two clothing conditions
R. M. Kanko, J. B. Outerleys, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2023
- Accuracy of a markerless motion capture system for balance related quantities
A. Chaumeil, B. K. Lahkar, … T. Robert·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2022