Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture
R. M. Kanko, E. K. Laende, E. M. Davis, W. S. Selbie, K. J. Deluzio
Abstract
Kinematic analysis is a useful and widespread tool used in research and clinical biomechanics for the estimation of human pose and the quantification of human movement. Common marker-based optical motion capture systems are expensive, time intensive, and require highly trained operators to obtain kinematic data. Markerless motion capture systems offer an alternative method for the measurement of kinematic data with several practical benefits. This work compared the kinematics of human gait measured using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system to those of a common marker-based motion capture system. Thirty healthy adult participants walked on a treadmill while data were simultaneously recorded using eight video cameras (markerless) and seven infrared optical motion capture cameras (marker-based). Video data were processed using markerless motion capture software, marker-based data were processed using marker-based capture software, and both sets of data were compared. The average root mean square distance (RMSD) between corresponding joints was less than 2.5 cm for all joints except the hip, which was 3.6 cm. Lower limb segment angles indicated pose estimates from both systems were very similar, with RMSD of less than 5.5{degrees} for all segment angles except those that represent rotations about the long axis of the segment. Lower limb joint angles captured similar patterns for flexion/extension at all joints, ab/adduction at the knee and hip, and toe-in/toe-out at the ankle. These findings demonstrate markerless motion capture can measure similar 3D kinematics to those from marker-based systems.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements
K. Song, T. J. Hullfish, … J. R. Baxter·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2023
- The Development and Evaluation of a Fully Automated Markerless Motion Capture Workflow
L. Needham, M. Evans, … S. L. Colyer·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2022
- Inter-session repeatability of markerless motion capture gait kinematics
R. M. Kanko, E. Laende, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2020
- From linear to nonlinear gait measures: validity of a multi-view markerless motion capture system
Baptiste Perthuy, Hugues Vinzant, … Leslie Marion Decker·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2026
- Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras
Nobuyasu Nakano, 哲郎 櫻, … Shinsuke Yoshioka·Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2020
- Comparison of concurrent and asynchronous running kinematics and kinetics from marker-based motion capture and markerless motion capture under two clothing conditions
R. M. Kanko, J. B. Outerleys, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2023