GlucoCEST MRI for the early evaluation response to chemotherapeutic and metabolic treatments in a murine triple negative breast cancer: a comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
M. Capozza, A. A. Anemone, C. Dhakan, M. Della Peruta, M. Bracesco, S. Zullino, D. Villano, E. Terreno, D. L. Longo, S. Aime
Abstract
PurposeTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients have usually poor outcome after chemotherapy and early prediction of therapeutic response would be helpful. [18F]F-FDG-PET/CT acquisitions are often carried out to monitor variation in metabolic activity associated to response to the therapy, despite moderate accuracy and radiation exposure limit its application. The glucoCEST technique relies on the use of unlabelled D-glucose to assess glucose uptake with conventional MRI scanners and is currently under active investigations at clinical level. This work aims at validating the potential of MRI-glucoCEST in monitoring early therapeutic responses in a TNBC tumor murine model. ProceduresBreast tumor (4T1) bearing mice were treated with doxorubicin or dichloroacetate for one week. PET/CT with [18F]F-FDG and MRI-glucoCEST were performed at baseline and after 3 cycles of treatment. Metabolic changes measured with [18F]F-FDG-PET and glucoCEST were compared and evaluated with changes in tumor volumes. ResultsDoxorubicin treated mice showed a significant decrease in tumor growth when compared to the control group. GlucoCEST imaging provided early metabolic response after three cycles of treatment, conversely, no variations were detect by in [18F]F-FDG uptake. Dichloroacetate treated mice did not show any decrease either in tumor volume or in tumor metabolic activity as assessed by both glucoCEST and [18F]F-FDG-PET. ConclusionsEarly metabolic changes during doxorubicin treatment can be predicted by glucoCEST imaging that appears more sensitive than [18F]F-FDG-PET in reporting on early therapeutic response. These findings support the view that glucoCEST may be a sensitive technique for monitoring metabolic response, but future studies are needed to explore the accuracy of this approach in other tumor types and treatments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- In vitro and in vivo comparison of the MRI glucoCEST properties between native glucose and 3OMG in a murine tumor model
A. A. Anemone, M. Capozza, … S. Aime·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2021
- Disruption of redox balance in glutaminolytic triple negative breast cancer by inhibition of glutamate export and glutaminase
- Detecting Early Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade by Multimodal Molecular Imaging
Y. Saida, J. R. Brender, … S. Kishimoto·Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Co-clinical FDG-PET Radiomic Signature in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Sudipta Singha Roy, Timothy Whitehead, … Kooresh Isaac Shoghi·European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2021
- L-5--glutamine PET of Breast Cancer: Kinetic Analysis in Mouse Models to Evaluate Glutamine Metabolism
Raheema A. Damani, Chris Hensley, … Elizabeth J. Li·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- GLUT1 inhibition blocks growth of RB1-positive Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Q. Wu, W. Alawi, … C. H. Arrowsmith·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2019