Sign in
NeuroscienceeLife
Peer-reviewed journal article

Perceiving animacy in 'identical' images

Tal BogeriD, Chaz FirestoneiD

Abstract

Some objects appear animate (e.g., dogs and elephants) while others do not (e.g., boots and sofas). This distinction pervades human cognition, with an expansive literature reporting striking effects of animacy on vision, memory, social perception, and neural organization. But studies of perceived animacy face a persistent challenge: Objects that differ in animacy tend to differ in many lower-level visual features (e.g., shape, texture, spatial frequency). Thus, it remains controversial whether animacy per se -- as opposed to its lower-level correlates -- drives visual processing. Here, we achieve previously unattainable levels of experimental control to demonstrate that the visual system represents animacy itself, beyond its lower-level covariates. We vary animacy while holding nearly all lower-level features constant by exploiting "visual anagrams" -- a diffusion-based technique for generating static images whose interpretations change radically with orientation. Eight pre-registered experiments leverage this approach to demonstrate that representations of animacy structure visual working memory and guide visual attention. Thus, the visual system extracts animacy itself, beyond its lower-level correlates.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
23th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSpriet '26Rostami '26Jozwik '22Bracci '19Farkas '24Proklova '19
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Céline Spriet, Farzad Rostami, Jean‐Rémy Hochmann+1 more·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Sep 16, 2026