Sign in
NeuroscienceStroke
Peer-reviewed journal article

Preparing for a second attack: a lesion simulation study on network resilience after stroke

Mitsouko van Assche, Julian KlugiD, Elisabeth DirreniD, Jonas RichiardiiD, Emmanuel CarreraiD

Abstract

Background and PurposeDoes the brain become more resilient after a first stroke to reduce the consequences of a new lesion? Although recurrent strokes are a major clinical issue, whether and how the brain prepares for a second attack is unknown. This is due to the difficulties to obtain an appropriate dataset of stroke patients with comparable lesions, imaged at the same interval after onset. Furthermore, timing of the recurrent event remains unpredictable. MethodsHere we used a novel clinical lesion simulation approach to test the hypothesis that resilience in brain networks increases during stroke recovery. 16 patients with a lesion restricted to the primary motor cortex were recruited. At 3 time points of the index event (10 days, 3 weeks, 3 months), we mimicked recurrent infarcts by deletion of nodes in brain networks (resting-state fMRI). Graph measures were applied to determine resilience (global efficiency) and wiring cost (mean degree) of the network. ResultsAt 10 days and 3 weeks after stroke, resilience was similar in patients and controls. However, at 3 months, while motor function had fully recovered, resilience to clinically representative simulated lesions was higher compared to controls (cortical lesion p=0.012; subcortical: p=0.009; cortico-subcortical: p=0.009). Similar results were found after random (p=0.012) and targeted (p=0.015) attacks. ConclusionOur results suggest that, after a lesion, brain networks reconfigure to increase resilience to future insults. Lesion simulation is an innovative approach, which may have major implications for stroke therapy. Individualized neuromodulation strategies could be developed to foster resilient network reconfigurations after a first stroke to limit the consequences of future attacks.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
7
FWCI
0.77
Field percentile
top 35%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMascaro '19Mascaro '17Ainsworth '18Carballo-Ca '22Zeiger '21Evangelista '23
67% semantic matchNeuroscience
Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro, Emilia Conti, Stefano Lai+9 more·Cell Reports·Sep 1, 2019· 75 citations