Mineral density differences between femoral cortical bone and trabecular bone are not explained by turnover rate alone
Abstract
Bone mineral density distributions (BMDDs) are a measurable property of bone tissues that depends strongly on bone remodelling and mineralisation processes. These processes can vary significantly in health and disease and across skeletal sites, so there is high interest in analysing these processes from experimental BMDDs. Here, we propose a rigorous hypothesis-testing approach based on a mathematical model of mineral heterogeneity in bone due to remodelling and mineralisation, to help explain differences observed between the BMDD of human femoral cortical bone and the BMDD of human trabecular bone. Recent BMDD measurements show that femoral cortical bone possesses a higher bone mineral density, but a similar mineral heterogeneity around the mean compared to trabecular bone. By combining this data with the mathematical model, we are able to test whether this difference in BMDD can be explained by (i) differences in turnover rate; (ii) differences in osteoclast resorption behaviour; and (iii) differences in mineralisation kinetics between the two bone types. We find that accounting only for differences in turnover rate is inconsistent with the fact that both BMDDs have a similar spread around the mean, and that accounting for differences in osteoclast resorption behaviour leads to biologically inconsistent bone remodelling patterns. We conclude that the kinetics of mineral accumulation in bone matrix must therefore be different in femoral cortical bone and trabecular bone. Although both cortical and trabecular bone are made up of lamellar bone, the different mineralisation kinetics in the two types of bone point towards more profound structural differences than usually assumed.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- μCT-based, Three-Dimensional Cortical Bone Mineral Density Distribution reveals Unique Phenotypes related to Bone Material Properties.
Serra Ucer Ozgurel, Arish Maredia, … James C. Fleet·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2025
- How osteons form: A quantitative hypothesis-testing analysis of cortical pore filling and wall asymmetry
S. G. Hegarty-Cremer, X. G. Borggaard, … P. R. Buenzli·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2023
- The cortical bone metabolome of C57BL/6J mice is sexually dimorphic
H. D. Welhaven, G. Vahidi, … R. K. June·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2021
- Bone mineral density modeling via random field: normality, stationarity, sex and age dependence
P. Henys, M. Vorechovsky, … N. Hammer·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2021
- Bone mineral density affects tumor growth by shaping microenvironmental heterogeneity
Matthew A. Whitman, Madhav Mantri, … Claudia Fischbach·BiomaterialsPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2024
- Intracortical remodelling increases in highly-loaded bone after exercise cessation
R. G. C. da Silva, T. C. Sun, … C. M. Riggs·bioRxiv·May 6, 2022