henhaobio
Sign in

PROTEOMICSSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry as a Tool for Metaproteomics: Interlaboratory Comparison Using a Model Microbiome

Andrew T. RajczewskiiD, J. Alfredo Blakeley‐RuiziD, Annaliese MeyeriD, Simina VintilaiD, Matthew R. McIlviniD, Tim Van Den BosscheiD, Brian C. SearleiD, Timothy J. GriffiniD, Mak A. SaitoiD, Manuel KleineriD, Pratik Dilip JagtapiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based metaproteomics is used to identify and quantify proteins in microbiome samples, with the frequently used methodology being Data-Dependent Acquisition mass spectrometry (DDA-MS). However, DDA-MS is limited in its ability to reproducibly identify and quantify lower abundant peptides and proteins. To address DDA-MS deficiencies, proteomics researchers have started using Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry (DIA-MS) for reproducible detection and quantification of peptides and proteins. We sought to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of DIA-MS metaproteomic measurements relative to DDA-MS using a mock community of known taxonomic composition. Artificial microbial communities of known composition were analyzed independently in three laboratories using DDA- and DIA-MS acquisition methods. DIA-MS yielded more protein and peptide identifications than DDA-MS in each laboratory. In addition, the protein and peptide identifications were more reproducible in all laboratories and provided an accurate quantification of proteins and taxonomic groups in the samples. We also identified some limitations of current DIA tools when applied to metaproteomic data, highlighting specific needs to improve DIA tools enabling analysis of metaproteomic datasets from complex microbiomes. Ultimately, DIA-MS represents a promising strategy for MS-based metaproteomics due to its large number of detected proteins and peptides, reproducibility, deep sequencing capabilities, and accurate quantitation.

Citations
27
FWCI
6.84
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.