Dynamic Allostery Highlights the Evolutionary Differences between the CoV-1 and CoV-2 Main Proteases
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has become one of the most immediate and widely-studied systems since its identification and subsequent global outbreak from 2019-2020. In an effort to understand the biophysical changes as a result of mutations, the mechanics of multiple different proteins within the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been studied and compared with SARS-CoV-1. Focusing on the main protease (mPro), we first explored the long range dynamic-relationship, particularly in cross-chain dynamics, using the Dynamic Coupling Index (DCI) to investigate the dynamic coupling between the catalytic site residues and the rest of the protein, both inter and intra chain for the CoV-1 and CoV-2 mPro. We found that there is significant cross-chain coupling between these active sites and distal residues in the CoV-2 mPro but it was missing in CoV-1. The enhanced long distance interactions, particularly between the two chains, suggest subsequently enhanced cooperativity for CoV-2. A further comparative analysis of the dynamic flexibility using the Dynamic Flexibility Index (DFI) between the CoV-1 and CoV-2 mPros shows that the inhibitor binding near active sites induces change in flexibility to a distal region of the protein, opposite in behavior between the two systems; this region becomes more flexible upon inhibitor binding in CoV-1 while it becomes less flexible in the CoV-2 mPro. Upon inspection, we show that, on average, the dynamic flexibility of the sites substituted from CoV-1 to CoV-2 changes significantly less than the average calculated across all residues within the structure, indicating that the differences in behaviors between the two systems is likely the result of allosteric influence, where the new substitutions in COV-2 induce flexibility and dynamical changes elsewhere in the structure. SIGNIFICANCEHere we have conducted a comparative analysis between the SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 mPro systems to shed mechanistic insight on the biophysical changes associated with the mutations between these two enzymes. Our work shows that the CoV-2 mPro system exhibits enhanced cross-chain communication between catalytic site residues and the rest of the structure. Further, both dynamic coupling and dynamic flexibility analyses indicates that, largely, the dynamic changes as evaluated by DCI and DFI occur at sites other than the mutation sites themselves, indicating that the functional differences between these two proteins are a result of dynamic allostery
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Impact of emerging mutations on the dynamic properties the SARS-CoV-2 main protease: an in silico investigation
Olivier Sheik Amamuddy, Gennady M. Verkhivker, Özlem Taştan Bishop·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2020
- Substrate recognition and selectivity in SARS-CoV-2 main protease: Unveiling the role of subsite interactions through dynamical nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations
H. T. H. Chan, A. S. F. Oliveira, … F. Duarte·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2023
- Computational Analysis of Dynamic Allostery and Control in the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease
I. Dubanevics, T. C. McLeish·bioRxiv·May 21, 2020
- Dynamical nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations identify allosteric sites and positions associated with drug resistance in the SARS-CoV-2 main protease
H. T. H. Chan, A. S. F. Oliveira, … F. Duarte·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2022
- The Conformational Space of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Active Site Loops is Determined by Ligand Binding and Interprotomer Allostery
Ethan Lee, Sarah Rauscher·BiochemistryPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Unveiling Mutation Effects on the Structural Dynamics of the Main Protease from SARS-CoV-2 with Hybrid Simulation Methods
E. A. Philot, P. Gasparini, … A. L. B. Scott·bioRxiv·Jul 17, 2021