Building Back More Equitable STEM Education: Teach Science by Engaging Students in Doing Science
S. C. R. Elgin, S. Hays, V. Mingo, C. D. Shaffer, J. Williams
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a national tragedy, one that has focused our attention on both the need to improve science education and the need to confront systemic racism in our country. We know that active learning strategies, in particular research experiences, can engage and empower STEM undergraduates, effectively closing the achievement gap for historically excluded persons. The apprenticeship model for STEM training - supervised research under a dedicated mentor - is highly effective, but out of reach for most students. Recent efforts have demonstrated that Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) can be an effective approach for making STEM research accessible for all. Our meta-analysis of CUREs finds that published examples now cover the breadth of the typical undergraduate biology curriculum. A thoughtfully designed CURE can go beyond foundational knowledge and analytical thinking to include career-related skills, e.g., teamwork and communication. Similarly, it can be designed with equity as a foundational principle, taking into account the unique contributions of all students and their varying needs. We provide here an example framework (The "Do Science Framework") for making STEM training more effective and inclusive using CUREs. While CUREs do not inherently address equity, there can be no equity in STEM education without equal access to research participation, and progress toward this goal can be achieved using CUREs. However, implementing new CUREs is not a trivial undertaking, particularly at schools with high teaching loads and little or no research infrastructure, including many community colleges. We therefore propose a National Center for Science Engagement to support this transition, building on experiences of current nationally established CUREs as well as the work of many individual faculty. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, academia has a renewed responsibility to dismantle structural inequities in education; engaging all STEM students in research can be a key step.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Variation in CURE instruction and limitations of CURE studies undermine what can be concluded about CURE effects on student outcomes
William Nathan Lantz, Erin L. Dolan, … Ania A. Majewska·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- A framework for decolonising and diversifying biomedical sciences curricula: rediscovery, representation and readiness
T. Lu, Z. I. Bashir, … A. Robson·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2023
- Building the Next Generation Workforce: Why We Need Science Policy Training at the Undergraduate Level
G. Bogard, E. Saybolt, … A. Bankston·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2023
- Enhancing senior high school student engagement and academic performance using an inclusive and scalable inquiry-based program
L. Davenport Huyer, N. I. Callaghan, … D. M. Kilkenny·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2019
- Increasing equity in science requires better ethics training: a course by trainees, for trainees
Roshni A. Patel, Rachel A. Ungar, … Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- Tiny Earth CURE improves student persistence in science
S. Miller, C. C. Aldana, … M. Estrada·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2023