bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
The genetic robustness of RNA and protein from evolutionary, structural and functional perspectives
Dorien S. Coray, Nellie Sibaeva, Stephanie McGimpseyiD, Paul P. GardneriD
Abstract
The reactions of functional molecules like proteins and RNAs to mutation affect both host cell viability and biomolecular evolution. These molecules are considered robust if function is maintained despite mutations. Proteins and RNAs have different structural and functional characteristics that affect their robustness, and to date, comparisons between them have been theoretical. In this work, we test the relative mutational robustness of RNA and protein pairs using three approaches: evolutionary, structural, and functional. We compare the nucleotide diversities of functional RNAs with those of matched proteins. Across different levels of conservation, we found the nucleotide-level variations between the biomolecules largely overlapped, with proteins generally supporting more variation than matched RNAs. We then directly tested the robustness of the protein and RNA pairs with in vitro and in silico mutagenesis of their respective genes. The in silico experiments showed that proteins and RNAs reacted similarly to point mutations and insertions or deletions, yet proteins are slightly more robust on average than RNAs. In vitro, mutated fluorescent RNAs retained greater levels of function than the proteins. Overall this suggests that proteins and RNAs have remarkably similar degrees of robustness, with the average protein having moderately higher robustness than RNA as a group.\n\nSignificance StatementThe ability of proteins and non-coding RNAs to maintain function despite mutations in their respective genes is known as mutational robustness. Robustness impacts how molecules maintain and change phenotypes, which has a bearing on the evolution and the origin of life as well as influencing modern biotechnology. Both protein and RNA have mechanisms that allow them to absorb DNA-level changes. Proteins have a redundant genetic code and non-coding RNAs can maintain structure and function through flexible base-pairing possibilities. The few theoretical treatments comparing protein and RNA robustness differ in their conclusions. In this experimental comparison of protein and RNA, we find that they have remarkably similar degrees of overall genetic robustness.
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Natural protein structures have evolved exceptional robustness to mutations
Samuel H. A. von der Dunk, Kamaludin Dingle, … Paulien Hogeweg·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2025
- Large-scale in silico mutagenesis experiments reveal optimization of genetic code and codon usage for protein mutational robustness
Martin Schwersensky, Marianne J. Rooman, Fabrizio Pucci·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020
- Functional Sensitivity and Mutational Robustness of Proteins
Q.-Y. Tang, T. S. Hatakeyama, K. Kaneko·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2020
- RNA-ligand complexes and the attenuation of neutral confinement in the evolution of RNA secondary structures
Antonio Loreto, Edgardo Ugalde, Carlos Espinosa‐Soto·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026
- Mutational Robustness Predicts Protein Dynamics Across Natural and Designed Proteins
Or Zuk·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2026
- Protein size and geometry govern mutational robustness
Srijita Acharya, Sucharita Dey·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026