Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Cortical Tracking of Speech and Music Predicts Reading Ability in Adults

Sarah Christine Allen, Stratos KoukouvinisiD, Saara M. VarjopuroiD, Anne KeiteliD

Abstract

Cortical tracking of acoustic features is essential for the neural processing of continuous stimuli such as speech and music. For example, it has been shown that children with dyslexia show atypical cortical tracking. This tracking may therefore reflect a fundamental auditory temporal processing mechanism supporting literacy more generally. In the current pre-registered study, we tested the hypothesis that cortical tracking of speech and music predicts reading ability in healthy young adults (N = 32), evaluated through a lexical decision task. Participants first completed an online session in which they performed a lexical decision task to assess their reading skills. This was followed by an electroencephalography (EEG) session, in which participants listened to a naturalistic short story and a music track. Using mutual information, we showed that neural activity aligned to both speech and music across a wide range of frequencies. Interestingly, cortical tracking was stronger for speech at very low frequencies, while it was stronger for music at higher frequencies. Critically, cortical tracking predicted reaction times in the lexical decision task in a frequency-dependent manner: stronger delta-band tracking ([~]1-3 Hz) for both speech and music was associated with faster reaction times, whereas stronger alpha-band tracking ([~]12 Hz) for speech was associated with slower reaction times. These findings remained significant even when controlling for stimulus type, age, musical experience and reading enjoyment. These results suggest that cortical tracking of speech and music reflect a domain-general temporal processing mechanism that is associated with reading ability beyond stimulus-specific features, and beyond development. These findings advance the neurobiological underpinnings of literacy and could potentially be leveraged for developing new reading interventions.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISZugarramurd '23Garcia-de-S '25Destoky '20Bonfiglio '26Osorio '25Destoky '22
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
Camila Zugarramurdi, Lucía Fernández, Marie Lallier+2 more·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2023