A psychometric platform to collect somatosensory sensations for neuroprosthetic use
Giacomo ValleiD, Francesco IberiteiD, Ivo StraussiD, Edoardo D’AnnaiD, Giuseppe GranataiD, Riccardo Di IorioiD, Thomas StieglitziD, Staniša RaspopovićiD, Francesco Maria PetriniiD, Paolo Maria RossiniiD, Silvestro MiceraiD
Abstract
Somatosensory neuroprostheses exploit invasive and non-invasive feedback technologies to restore sensorimotor functions lost to disease or trauma. These devices use electrical stimulation to communicate sensory information to the brain. A sensation characterization procedure is thus necessary to determine the appropriate stimulation parameters and to establish a clear personalized map of the sensations that can be restored. Several questionnaires have been described in the literature to collect the quality, type, location and intensity of the evoked sensations, but there is still no standard psychometric platform. Here we propose a new psychometric system containing previously validated questionnaires on evoked sensations, which can be applied to any kind of somatosensory neuroprosthesis. The platform collects stimulation parameters used to elicit sensations; records subjects percepts in terms of sensation location, type, quality, perceptual threshold, and intensity. It further collects data using standardized assessment questionnaires and scales, performs measurements over time, and collects phantom limb pain syndrome data. The psychometric platform is user-friendly and provides clinicians with all the information needed to assess the sensory feedback. The psychometric platform was validated with three trans-radial amputees. They platform was used to assess intraneural sensory feedback provided through implanted peripheral nerve interfaces. The proposed platform could act as a new standardized assessment toolbox to homogenize the reporting of results obtained with different technologies in the field of somatosensory neuroprosthetics.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback
Edoardo D’Anna, Giacomo Valle, … Silvestro Micera·Science RoboticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2019
- The crossmodal congruency task as a measure of intuitiveness of sensory feedback in the lower limb
Rohit Bose, Bailey A. Petersen, … Lee E. Fisher·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2026
- Assessing the quality of supplementary sensory feedback using a crossmodal congruency task
Daniel H. Blustein, Adam W. Wilson, Jon W. Sensinger·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2018
- Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis
- Generating Artificial Sensations with Spinal Cord Stimulation in Primates and Rodents
Amol P. Yadav, Shuangyan Li, … Miguel A. L. Nicolelis·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2021
- Characterization of cutaneous reflexes elicited from saphenous nerve stimulation
Russell L. Hardesty, Sebastián Rueda Parra, … Jodi A. Brangaccio·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2025