Taxonomic vs. Functional Diversity for the Impact Assessment of Offshore Oil & Gas Activities: An Exploratory Study on Benthic Prokaryotes
Andrea BagiiD, Anders LanzéniD, Jon Thomassen HestetuniD, Thomas G. DahlgreniD, Aud LarseniD, Miriam I. BrandtiD
Abstract
Improving environmental management in the offshore Oil & Gas sector requires approaches that capture the ecosystem services (ES) provided by marine sediments, particularly their roles in carbon and nutrient cycling. Microbial communities are central to these processes, and molecular tools offer new opportunities to assess their functional diversity. To explore how different sequencing approaches inform environmental impact assessment, we compared taxonomic and functional prediction based on 16S metabarcoding, shotgun metagenomics and messenger RNA-based metatranscriptomics, targeting prokaryotic communities. Our aims were to evaluate the ability of each approach to detect impact and to determine how well they captured functions relevant to ES. All approaches revealed clear differences in community composition between impacted and non-impacted sediments at both taxonomic and functional levels, with impact significantly associated with hydrocarbon and barium content. Functional inventories showed substantial overlap across the three approaches, and 48-55 ES-related processes were detectable in all datasets. While metagenomics provided the strongest statistical discrimination between impact groups, metatranscriptomics resolved the actively expressed pathways underpinning ES, yielding the most biologically meaningful functional profiles despite its lower statistical power. All approaches indicated that Oil & Gas activity drives shift towards anaerobic, hydrocarbon-degrading, and sulfur-respiring microbial communities, with hydrocarbon degradation, sulfur cycling, and metal detoxification being the dominant ES processes in impacted sediments. Metabarcoding was confirmed as a cost-effective option for impact assessment when focused on taxonomic composition. However, functional prediction from metabarcoding data proved less reliable, as several ES showed contrasting associations to impact category between metabarcoding and shotgun sequencing approaches.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Meta-analysis of 139 extant Tara ocean metagenomes to unveil the relationship between taxonomy and functionality in prokaryotes inhabiting aquatic ecosystems
R. Starke·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2020
- Metagenomic Characteristics of Bacterial Response to Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination in Diverse Environments as Revealed by Functional Taxonomic Strategies
A. Mukherjee, B. Chettri, … D. Chattopadhyay·bioRxiv·Dec 29, 2016
- Predicting coarse-grained representations of biogeochemical cycles from metabarcoding data
Arnaud Belcour, Loris Megy, … Delphine Ropers·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2025
- The utility of a metagenomics approach for marine biomonitoring
G. A. C. Singer, S. Shekarriz, … M. Hajibabaei·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2020
- Environmental selection influences the microbiome of subsurface petroleum reservoirs
D. A. Gittins, S. Bhatnagar, C. R. J. Hubert·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2022
- Deep long-read metagenomic sequencing reveals niche differentiation in carbon cycling potential between benthic and planktonic microbial populations
Tomeu Viver, Katrin Knittel, … Luis H. Orellana·Environmental MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2025