in silico PlantsSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Testing the inferred transcription rates of a dynamic, gene network model in absolute units
Abstract
The circadian clock coordinates plant physiology and development. Mathematical clock models have provided a rigorous framework to understand how the observed rhythms emerge from disparate, molecular processes. However, models of the plant clock have largely been built and tested against RNA timeseries data in arbitrary, relative units. This limits model transferability, refinement from biochemical data and applications in synthetic biology. Here, we incorporate absolute mass units into a detailed, gene circuit model of the clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. We re-interpret the established P2011 model, highlighting a transcriptional activator that overlaps the function of REVEILLE 8/LHY-CCA1-LIKE 5, and refactor dynamic equations for the Evening Complex. The U2020 model incorporates the repressive regulation of PRR genes, a key feature of the most detailed clock model F2014, without greatly increasing model complexity. We tested the experimental error distributions of qRT-PCR data calibrated for units of RNA transcripts/cell and of circadian period estimates, in order to link the models to data more appropriately. U2019 and U2020 models were constrained using these data types, recreating previously-described circadian behaviours with RNA metabolic processes in absolute units. To test their inferred rates, we estimated a distribution of observed, transcriptome-wide transcription rates (Plant Empirical Transcription Rates, PETR) in units of transcripts/cell/hour. The PETR distribution and the equivalent degradation rates indicated that the models predicted rates are biologically plausible, with individual exceptions. In addition to updated, explanatory models of the plant clock, this validation process represents an advance in biochemical realism for models of plant gene regulation.
- organism: Arabidopsis
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Field percentile
- top 44%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Abundant clock proteins point to missing molecular regulation in the plant circadian clock
Uriel Urquiza‐García, Nacho Molina, … Andrew John Millar·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2025
- Dissecting the Network Architecture of a Plant Circadian Clock Model: Identifying Key Regulatory Mechanisms and Essential Interactions
Shashank Kumar Singh, Ashutosh Srivastava·bioRxiv·May 10, 2026
- Molecular and transcriptional structure of the petal and leaf circadian clock in Petunia hybrida
M. I. Terry, M. Carrera-Alesina, … M. Egea-Cortines·bioRxiv·May 17, 2019
- The plant circadian clock exerts stronger control over the diel proteome than the transcriptome
Devang Mehta, Mohana Talasila, … R. Glen Uhrig·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2026
- A spatial model of the plant circadian clock reveals design principles for coordinated timing under noisy environments
M. Greenwood, I. T. Tokuda, J. C. Locke·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2020
- Data-driven mathematical modelling explains altered timing of EARLY FLOWERING 3 in the wheat circadian oscillator
Abhishek Upadhyay, Jamila Rowland-Chandler, … James C W Locke·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2026