Regional and age-dependent Effects of Cortical Magnetic Stimulation on Unconstrained Reaching Behavior
M. A. UrbiniD, Jing TianiD, Charles W. Lafe, Gina McKernaniD, Nick KortzorgiD, Lore WyersiD, Florian Van Halewyck, Matthieu P. BoisgontieriD, Oron LeviniD, Stephan Patrick SwinneniD, Ilse JonkersiD, George Frederick WittenbergiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe specific and dynamic contributions of premotor and supplementary motor areas to reaching movements in aging humans are not well understood. ObjectiveTo better understand the role of cortical motor regions and age on the control of unconstrained reaches against gravity by neurologically intact, younger and older adults. MethodsDouble pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at locations targeting primary motor cortex (M1), dorsal premotor area (PMA), supplementary motor area (SMA), or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Paired stimuli were delivered before or after a visual cue was presented to initiate self-paced right-handed reaches to one of three, vertically oriented target locations. ResultsRegional stimulation effects on movement amplitude were observed both early and late in the reach. PMA stimulation increased reach distance to a greater extent than M1, SMA, and DLPFC stimulation. M1 and PMA stimulation increased deviation from the straight-line path around the time of peak velocity to an extent that was greater than SMA and DLPFC stimulation. Cortical stimulation increased the time that elapsed after, but not before, peak velocity. Despite stronger effects of stimulation on reaches in the younger group, this group had shorter times to reach the target after reaching peak velocity. ConclusionThese results provide support for a role of PMA in visually guided movement after movement initiation. For older subjects, the increased time to arrive at the target after peak velocity despite weaker stimulation effects suggests an age-related reduction in sensorimotor processing flexibility for online control of unconstrained reaching. HighlightsO_LIDorsal premotor area stimulation at any time during the reaction-time period and early reaching affected early reach kinematics at least as much as stimulation of primary motor cortex. C_LIO_LIOlder individuals had more stimulation-related interference in the late components of reaching despite having less early effect of stimulation, suggesting a reduction in flexibility of dynamic motor control due to aging. C_LIO_LIThe antigravity component of unconstrained reaching did not have special aspects for regional cortical effects of stimulation. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Field percentile
- 50th percentile
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mapping the Causal Roles of Non-Primary Motor Areas in Human Reach Planning and Execution
Golnaz Haddadshargh, Roberto M. de Freitas, … George Frederick Wittenberg·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026
- Modulation of dorsal premotor cortex disrupts neuroplasticity of primary motor cortex in young and older adults
Wei‐Yeh Liao, George M. Opie, … John G. Semmler·bioRxiv·May 28, 2023
- Normal aging affects unconstrained three-dimensional reaching against gravity with reduced vertical precision and increased co-contraction
George Frederick Wittenberg, Jing Tian, … Ilse Jonkers·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2020
- Younger adult brain utilizes interhemispheric strategy of recruiting ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex for complex finger movement, but not aging brain
Gen Miura, Tomoyo Morita, … Eiichi Naito·Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2025
- Age-related changes in the motor planning strategy slow down motor initiation in elderly adults
Nikita S. Frolov, Пицик Елена Николаевна, … Alexander E. Hramov·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2020
- Age-related increases in reaction time result from slower preparation, not delayed initiation
Robert M. Hardwick, Alexander D. Forrence, … Adrian Mark Haith·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2022