Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Threshold Combined with Reverse-Calculated Electric Field Modeling Can Determine Individualized tDCS Dosage
Kevin A. CaulfieldiD, Bashar W. BadraniD, William H. DeVries, Philipp M. Summers, Emma Kofmehl, Xingbao LiiD, Jeffrey J. BorckardtiD, Marom BiksoniD, Mark S. GeorgeiD
Abstract
BackgroundUnique amongst brain stimulation tools, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) currently lacks an easy method for individualizing dosage.\n\nObjectiveCan one individually dose tDCS? We developed a novel method of reverse-calculating electric-field (E-field) models based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans that can determine individualized tDCS dose. We also sought to develop an MRI-free method of individualizing tDCS dose by measuring transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor threshold (MT) and single pulse, suprathreshold transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) MT and regressing it against E-field modeling.\n\nMethodsIn 29 healthy adults, we acquired TMS MT, TES MT, and structural MRI scans with a fiducial marking the motor hotspot. We then computed a \"reverse-calculated tDCS dose\" of tDCS applied at the scalp needed to cause a 1.00V/m E-field at the cortex. Finally, we examined whether the predicted E-field values correlated with each participants measured TMS MT or TES MT.\n\nResultsWe were able to determine a reverse-calculated tDCS dose for each participant. The Transcranial Electrical Stimulation MT, but not the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation MT, significantly correlated with the calculated tDCS dose determined by E-field modeling (R2 = 0.509, p < 0.001).\n\nConclusionsReverse-calculation E-field modeling, alone or in combination with TES MT, shows promise as a method to individualize tDCS dose. The large range of the reverse-calculated tDCS doses between subjects underscores the likely need to individualize tDCS dose. If these results are confirmed in future studies, TES MT may evolve into an inexpensive and quick method to individualize tDCS dose.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Towards the identification and optimization of the "dose-response" relationship of transcranial direct current stimulation
Ricardo Salvador, Maria Chiara Biagi, … Giulio Ruffini·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2022
- The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude
Ainslie Johnstone, Catharina Zich, … Sven Bestmann·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Harmonizing the stimulation dose of focal tDCS across target sites
Axel Thielscher, Dayana Hayek, … Daria Antonenko·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2026
- Electric field dependent effects of motor cortical TDCS
Ilkka Laakso, Marko Mikkonen, … Satoshi Tanaka·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- Optimizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target cortical electric field: Evidence from 3000 Human Connectome Project models
Kevin A. Caulfield, Mark S. George·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2021
- Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site
Carys Evans, Clarissa Bachmann, … Sven Bestmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2019