EP EuropaceSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Improved Outcome And Cost Effectiveness In Ablation Of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Under General Anaesthetic
Claire MartiniD, James P. CurtainiD, Parag Ravindra GajendragadkariD, David BegleyiD, Simon P. FynniD, Andrew A. GraceiD, Patrick M. HeckiD, Kiran Salaunkey, Munmohan Virdee, Sharad AgarwaliD
Abstract
AimsOutcome of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains suboptimal. Techniques employed to reduce arrhythmia recurrence rate are more likely to be embraced if cost-effectiveness can be demonstrated. A single-centre observational study assessed whether use of general anaesthesia (GA) in persistent AF ablation improved outcome and was cost-effective.\n\nMethods292 patients undergoing first ablation procedures for persistent AF under conscious sedation or GA were followed. End points were freedom from listing for repeat ablation at 18 months and freedom from recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at one year.\n\nResultsFreedom from atrial arrhythmia was higher in patients who underwent ablation under GA rather than sedation (63.9% vs 42.3%, HR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.86, p = 0.002). Significantly fewer GA patients were listed for repeat procedures (29.2% vs 42.7%, HR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.60, p = 0.044). Despite GA procedures costing slightly more, a saving of {pound}177 can be made per patient in our centre for a maximum of 2 procedures if all persistent AF ablations are performed under GA.\n\nConclusionsIn patients with persistent AF, it is both clinical and economically more effective to perform ablation under GA rather than sedation.\n\nWhats New?O_LIThere is very little known regarding the clinical outcome of catheter ablation of AF under GA compared with sedation; to our knowledge there is one study only in paroxysmal AF and no studies examining cost effectiveness.\nC_LIO_LIThis study shows that in patients with persistent AF, it is both clinical and economically more effective to perform ablation under GA rather than sedation.\nC_LIO_LIThis study leads us to recommend the use of GA for the ablation of persistent AF. As PAF ablation is now increasingly being undertaken by single shot techniques which do not have the same requirements for analgesia and immobility, GA resources may be allocated for persistent AF ablation.\nC_LI
- Citations
- 51
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ablation Of Complex Fractionated Electrograms Improves Outcome In Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Claire Martin, James P. Curtain, … Sharad Agarwal·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2017
- Comparison of therapeutic effects between pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and me-ta-analysis
Yun Wan, Shuting Zeng, … Jun Luo·Cardiology in ReviewPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2024
- Rapid Shift Toward Pulsed Field Ablation and Precision Risk Stratification in High-Impact Atrial Fibrillation Research
Zheng Su, Tinsley Li·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- Regions of Highly Recurrent Electrogram Morphology at Sites of Low Cycle Length Accurately Reflect Arrhythmogenic Substrate for Atrial Fibrillation - Implications For a New, Mechanism Guided Therapeutic Approach for Atrial Fibrillation
S. Yoo, M. Rottmann, … R. Arora·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020
- Successful stimulation of myocardial ganglionic plexuses by TAU 20 in the absence of cardiac damage
Shengzhe Li, Jamie Kay, … Rasheda A. Chowdhury·Frontiers in PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2025
- Electrophysiological dependent antiarrhythmic drug response in population-based models of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Violeta Puche-García, Laura Martinez-Mateu, … Javier Saiz·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2026