Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Benchmarking computational methods for single-cell chromatin data analysis
Siyuan LuoiD, Pierre‐Luc GermainiD, Mark D. RobinsoniD, Ferdinand von MeyenniD
Abstract
Single-cell chromatin accessibility assays, such as scATAC-seq, are increasingly employed in individual and joint multi-omic profiling of single cells. As the accumulation of scATAC-seq and multi-omics datasets continue, challenges in analyzing such sparse, noisy, and high-dimensional data become pressing. Specifically, one challenge relates to optimizing the processing of chromatin-level measurements and efficiently extracting information to discern cellular heterogeneity. This is of critical importance, since the identification of cell types is a fundamental step in current single-cell data analysis practices. We benchmarked 8 feature engineering pipelines derived from 5 recent methods to assess their ability to discover and discriminate cell types. By using 10 metrics calculated at the cell embedding, shared nearest neighbor graph, or partition levels, we evaluated the performance of each method at different data processing stages. This comprehensive approach allowed us to thoroughly understand the strengths and weaknesses of each method and the influence of parameter selection. Our analysis provides guidelines for choosing analysis methods for different datasets. Overall, feature aggregation, SnapATAC, and SnapATAC2 outperform latent semantic indexing-based methods. For datasets with complex cell-type structures, SnapATAC and SnapATAC2 are preferred. With large datasets, SnapATAC2 and ArchR are most scalable.
- assay: scATAC-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of computational methods for the analysis of single-cell ATAC-seq data
Huidong Chen, Caleb A. Lareau, … Luca Pinello·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2019
- Going beyond cell clustering and feature aggregation: Is there single cell level information in single-cell ATAC-seq data?
Aaron Wing Cheung Kwok, Heejung Shim, Davis James McCarthy·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2024
- Network diffusion for scalable embedding of massive single-cell ATAC-seq data
Kangning Dong, Shihua Zhang·中国科学通报:英文版Peer-reviewed·May 15, 2021
- Benchmarking Automated Cell Type Annotation Tools for Single-cell ATAC-seq Data
Yuge Wang, Xingzhi Sun, Hongyu Zhao·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2022
- Classifying cells with Scasat - a tool to analyse single-cell ATAC-seq
Syed Murtuza Baker, Connor Rogerson, … Magnus Rattray·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2018
- Benchmarking algorithms for joint integration of unpaired and paired single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data
Michelle Y. Y. Lee, Klaus H. Kaestner, Mingyao Li·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2023