Sign in
ZoologybioRxiv
Preprint

Effects of substrate on shrimp growth, water quality and bacterial community in the biofloc system nursing Penaeus vannamei postlarvae

H.-H. Huang, C.-Y. Li, Y.-J. Lei, W.-Q. Kuang, B.-L. Zhou, W.-S. Zou, P.-H. Yang

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of substrate on water quality, shrimp growth and bacterial community in the biofloc system with a salinity of 5{per thousand}. Two treatments, biofloc system with (sB) or without (nB) addition of elastic solid packing filler (nylon) as substrate, were set up. Penaeus vannamei postlarvae (PL, ~ stage 15) were stocked at a density of 4000 PL m-3 in each treatment with triplicates for a 28-days culture experiment, taking glucose as carbon source (C:N 15:1). Results showed that the survival rate (96.3{+/-}3.6%), FCR (0.76{+/-}0.06) and productivity (1.54{+/-}0.12 kg m-3) in sB treatment were significantly better than those in nB treatment (81.0{+/-}7.1%, 0.98{+/-}0.08 and 1.14{+/-}0.09 kg m-3, P<0.05). All water parameters were in the recommended ranges. Substrate showed significant effect on TAN, TSS, turbidity, biofloc volume, pH and carbonate alkalinity (P < 0.05). Actinobacteria (4.0-22.7%), Bacteroidetes (10.4-33.5%), Firmicutes (0.2-11.2%), Planctomycetes (4.0-14.9%) and Proteobacteria (29.4-59.0%) were the most dominant phyla for both treatments. However, the bacterial community in sB treatment showed to be significantly different from that in nB treatment (Jaccard distance 0.94{+/-}0.01, P=0.001). Substrate showed significant effects on Shannon, Heip, Pielou and Simpson index, as well as relative abundances of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes (P < 0.05). The results suggested that addition of substrate affected the shrimp growth, water quality and bacterial community in the biofloc system nursing P. vannamei PL with a 5{per thousand} salinity.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHashim '18Huang '21Huang '22Shan '25Alloul '20Heyse '20
76% semantic matchMicrobiology