bioRxivBiophysics
Elongated cells drive morphogenesis in a surface-wrapped finite element model of germband retraction
W. T. McCleery, J. H. Veldhuis, G. W. Brodland, M. E. Bennett, M. S. Hutson
Abstract
During Drosophila embryogenesis, the germband first extends to curl around the posterior end of the embryo, and then retracts back; however, retraction is not simply the reversal of extension. At a tissue level, extension is coincident with ventral furrow formation, and at a cellular level, extension occurs via convergent cell neighbor exchanges in the germband while retraction involves only changes in cell shape. To understand how cell shapes, tissue organization and cellular forces drive germband retraction, we investigate this process using a whole-embryo, surface-wrapped cellular finite element model. This model represents two key epithelial tissues - amnioserosa and germband - as adjacent sheets of 2D cellular finite elements that are wrapped around an ellipsoidal 3D approximation of an embryo. The model reproduces the detailed kinematics of in vivo retraction by fitting just one free model parameter, the tension along germband cell interfaces; all other cellular forces are constrained to follow ratios inferred from experimental observations. With no additional parameter adjustments, the model also reproduces failures of retraction when amnioserosa cells are removed to mimic U-shaped mutants or laser-microsurgery experiments. Surprisingly, retraction in the model is robust to changes in cellular force values, but is critically dependent on starting from a configuration with highly elongated amnioserosa cells. Their extreme cellular elongation is established during the prior process of germband extension and is then used to drive retraction. The amnioserosa is the one tissue whose cellular morphogenesis is reversed in germband extension and retraction - serving as a store of morphological information that coordinates the forces needed to retract the germband back to its pre-extension position and shape. In this case, and perhaps more generally, cellular force strengths are less important than the carefully established cell shapes that direct them.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Actomyosin cables position cell cohorts during Drosophila germband retraction by entraining their morphodynamic and mechanical properties
S. Nandi, A. Balse, … M. Narasimha·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2022
- Drosophila germ band extension: a two-state reshaping mechanism
Tianyi Zhu, Hongkang Zhu, Ben O’Shaughnessy·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2026
- Anisotropy links cell shapes to a solid-to-fluid transition during convergent extension
Xun Wang, Matthias Merkel, … Karen E. Kasza·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2020
- Cortical elasticity determines the geometry of prospective mesoderm constriction in Drosophila melanogaster
Konstantin Doubrovinski·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2017
- Geometry can provide long-range mechanical guidance for embryogenesis
Mahamar Dicko, Pierre Saramito, … J Etienne·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2017
- Cyclic muscle contractions reinforce the acto-myosin motors and mediate the full elongation of C. elegans embryo
A. Dai, M. Ben Amar·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2023