Sign in
Developmental BiologyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Peer-reviewed journal article

Anisotropy links cell shapes to a solid-to-fluid transition during convergent extension

Xun WangiD, Matthias MerkeliD, Leo Sutter, Gonca Erdemci-TandoganiD, M. Lisa ManningiD, Karen E. KaszaiD

Abstract

Within developing embryos, tissues flow and reorganize dramatically on timescales as short as minutes. This includes epithelial tissues, which often narrow and elongate in convergent extension movements due to anisotropies in external forces or in internal cell-generated forces. However, the mechanisms that allow or prevent tissue reorganization, especially in the presence of strongly anisotropic forces, remain unclear. We study this question in the converging and extending Drosophila germband epithelium, which displays planar polarized myosin II and experiences anisotropic forces from neighboring tissues, and we show that in contrast to isotropic tissues, cell shape alone is not sufficient to predict the onset of rapid cell rearrangement. From theoretical considerations and vertex model simulations, we predict that in anisotropic tissues two experimentally accessible metrics of cell patterns--the cell shape index and a cell alignment index--are required to determine whether an anisotropic tissue is in a solid-like or fluid-like state. We show that changes in cell shape and alignment over time in the Drosophila germband indicate a solid-to-fluid transition that corresponds to the onset of cell rearrangement and convergent extension in wild-type embryos and are also consistent with more solid-like behavior in bnt mutant embryos. Thus, the onset of cell rearrangement in the germband can be predicted by a combination of cell shape and alignment. These findings suggest that convergent extension is associated with a transition to more fluid-like tissue behavior, which may help accommodate tissue shape changes during rapid developmental events.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
176
FWCI
9.35
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.