henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivGenomicsPreprint

CLADES - Contrastive Learning Augmented DifferEntial Splicing with Orthologous Positive Pairs

Arghamitra TalukderiD, Nicholas Keung, Itsik Pe'er, David A. KnowlesiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) reshapes transcript and protein repertoires across biological, e.g. cellular, contexts. However, learning sequence [->] content-specific splicing mappings is challenging due to limited labels across tissues and cell types and variability introduced by experimental protocols. We propose a contrastive representation learning pre-training approach grounded in evolutionary conservation. Orthologous exon-intron junction sequences are treated as semantically consistent views of the same regulatory program: evolutionary orthologs are positive pairs, non-homologous junctions are negatives. This discriminative objective aligns embeddings of regulatory equivalents while separating functionally unrelated sequences, inducing invariances to unconstrained sequence and emphasizing conserved motif/RBP and positional signals. We show that this pre-training strategy provides representations that help predict{Delta}{psi} , the change in exon inclusion between conditions, which encodes both direction and magnitude of splicing shifts. Specifically, we finetune a lightweight supervised head on available labels to predict{Delta}{psi} . To make these predictions biologically meaningful, we further introduce an interpretable, splice-motif-aware classification framework grounded in known regulatory signals. On benchmarks spanning tissue- and cell-type differential splicing, the learned representations yield strong{Delta}{psi} classification performance (AUPRC/AUROC for increased/decreased inclusion) and competitive results for regression (RMSE, Spearman). These findings indicate that evolution-as-augmentation, instantiated via contrastive learning, is an effective and biologically principled route to context-resolved splicing prediction.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJha '17Thapa '26Reddy '26Runyan '26Dutta '18Vetsigian '26
59% semantic matchBioinformatics
Anupama Jha, Matthew R. Gazzara, Yoseph Barash·Bioinformatics·Apr 20, 2017· 78 citations