Environmental DNAEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Tracking the phenology of riverine insect communities using environmental DNA
Eva CereghettiiD, Xhesida Ajvazi, Raphaël Bossart, François KeckiD, Andrea PatrignaniiD, Nicolò Tartini, Florian AltermattiD, Luca CarraroiD
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 5th percentile
Abstract
Aquatic insects are iconic and ecologically highly relevant inhabitants of riverine ecosystems. They are also often the target of monitoring programs to assess the ecological status of these lotic habitats. Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques have been widely and successfully implemented to investigate freshwater insects and other macroinvertebrates. Commonly, such monitoring is conducted at one or two timepoints per year, despite the known strong seasonality and phenology of aquatic insects. Here, we assessed if and how eDNA can capture the temporal changes of the orders Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), Trichoptera (caddisflies) and Diptera (true flies). We carried out eDNA sampling at roughly monthly intervals from April to October at 25 sites across a whole river catchment in the northeastern part of Switzerland. We found pronounced, cyclic phenological trends in all orders but Trichoptera: the communities diverged from spring to summer and then in fall gradually returned closer to the spring state. The four orders exhibited different predominance in gains or losses of species detection throughout this time interval. Lastly, we found that field replicates, despite showing a relatively high local stochasticity, were able to provide a more complete assessment of aquatic communities and could thus be used as a proxy for the frequency of observation of a species through the seasons. In fact, this approach yielded comparable temporal patterns to the ones extracted from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Overall, our findings demonstrate that eDNA techniques can be used to reveal intra-annual dynamics of aquatic insects. Given the current necessity to assess and monitor the biodiversity status of ecosystems, we therefore show that eDNA methods are a viable option to obtain a deeper understanding of the structuring of freshwater communities over time.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Definitive environmental DNA research on aquatic insects: Analysis optimization using the recently developed MtInsects-16S primers set
M. Takenaka, Y. Hasebe, … K. Tojo·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2023
- Simultaneously monitoring aquatic and riparian biodiversity using riverine water eDNA
- Environmental DNA vs. Community Science: Strengths and Limitations for Urban Odonata Surveys
Rhema Uche‐Dike, Ethan Tolman, … Christopher D. Beatty·Insect Conservation and DiversityPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2025
- A triad of kicknet sampling, eDNA metabarcoding, and predictive modeling to assess aquatic macroinvertebrate biodiversity
F. Keck, S. Hürlemann, … F. Altermatt·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2022
- eDNA metabarcoding provides scalable and continuous biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026
- Influence of Preservation Methods, Sample Medium and Sampling Time on eDNA Recovery in a Neotropical River
Naiara Guimarães Sales, Owen Simon Wangensteen, … Stefano Mariani·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2019