Simultaneously monitoring aquatic and riparian biodiversity using riverine water eDNA
H. YANG, H. DU, H. QI, L. YU, X. HOU, H. ZHANG, J. LI, J. WU, C. WANG, Q. ZHOU, Q. WEI
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring is a critical technical advance. Both aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity information can be detected in riverine water eDNA. However, it remains unverified whether riverine water eDNA can be used to simultaneously monitor aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. Our specific objective was to assess the effectiveness of monitoring aquatic and riparian biodiversity using riverine water eDNA. We proposed that the monitoring effectiveness (the proportion of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity information detected by riverine water eDNA samples) could be approximated by the transportation effectiveness of land-to-river and upstream-to-downstream biodiversity information flow. We conducted a case study in a watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and estimated the effectiveness of using riverine water eDNA to monitor aquatic and riparian biodiversity based on comparing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and species assemblages of three taxonomic communities detected in riverine water eDNA samples and riparian soil eDNA samples in spring, summer, and autumn. The aquatic and riparian biodiversity of a watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau could be simultaneously effectively monitored using riverine water eDNA on summer or autumn rainy days. Monitoring bacterial communities was more efficient than monitoring eukaryotic communities. On summer rainy days, 43%-76% of riparian species could be detected in water eDNA samples, 92%-99% of upstream species could be detected in a 1-km downstream eDNA sample, and more than 50% of dead bioinformation (i.e., the bioinformation labeling the biological material without life activity and fertility) could be monitored 4-6 km downstream for eukaryotes and 13-19 km for bacteria. We encourage more studies on the monitoring effectiveness for each taxonomic community in other watersheds with different environmental conditions. We believe that in future ecological research, conservation and management, we could efficiently monitor and assess the aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity by simply using riverine water eDNA samples.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2021
- Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers
H. A. Broadhurst, L. M. Gregory, … A. McDevitt·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2021
- Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information
Kristy Deiner, Emanuel A. Fronhofer, … Florian Altermatt·bioRxiv·May 27, 2016
- eDNA metabarcoding provides scalable and continuous biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding of rivers: Not all eDNA is everywhere, and not all the time
Jan‐Niklas Macher, Florian Leese·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2017
- Estimation of biodiversity metrics by environmental DNA metabarcoding compared with visual and capture surveys of river fish communities