Enhancing Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Interpretation in Neurogenetics: Collaborative Experiences from a Tertiary Care Centre
Kayla HorowitziD, Nellie H. FotopoulosiD, Alana J. Mistry, Justin SimoiD, Miranda MedeirosiD, Isabela Dall Oglio BuccoiD, Mia GinsbergiD, Emily DwoshiD, Roberta La PianaiD, Guy Armand RouleauiD, Allison Ann DilliottiD, Sali M.K. FarhaniD
Abstract
BackgroundThe findings of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on a clinical genetic testing report pose a challenge for attending healthcare professionals (HCPs) in patient care. Here, we describe the outcomes of multidisciplinary VUS Rounds, implemented at a neurological disease tertiary care centre, which aid in interpreting and communicating VUS identified in our neurogenetics patient population. MethodsVUS Rounds brought together genetic counsellors, molecular geneticists, and scientists to evaluate VUS against genomic and phenotypic evidence and assign an internal temperature classification "VUS Hot", "True VUS", or "VUS Cold", corresponding to potential pathogenicity. Biweekly meetings were held among the committee to deliberate variant classifications, determine additional clinical management actions, and discuss nuances of VUS result communication. ResultsIn total, 143 VUS identified in 72 individuals with neurological disease were curated between October 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 12.6% were classified as VUS Hot, carried by 22.2% of the individuals, allowing for prioritization of additional evaluation to determine potential pathogenicity of the variants, such as clinical follow-up or segregation analysis. In contrast, 45.4% of VUS were Cold and could be eliminated from further consideration in the carriers care. Herein, we thoroughly evaluated the various evidence that contributed to our VUS classifications and resulting clinical actions. ConclusionsThe assessment of VUS leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration allowed us to delineate required follow-up analyses for our neurology patient population. Integration of VUS Rounds into healthcare practices, ensures equitable knowledge dissemination amongst HCPs and effective incorporation of uncertain genetic results into patient care.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Field percentile
- top 20%
- Organism
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct rates of VUS reclassification are observed when subclassifying VUS by evidence level
Gwendolyn Bennett, Izabela Karbassi, … Heidi L. Rehm·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2025
- VUSVista: Enhancing the Curation of Variants of Uncertain Significance
Esther Spiteri, Jeanesse Scerri, Jean-Paul Ebejer·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2025
- From Uncertain to Actionable: Significant Reduction in Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Germline Testing via Multi-Institutional Real-World Evidence
Kelly M. Schiabor Barrett, Matthew J. Ferber, … Elizabeth T. Cirulli·medRxiv·Aug 12, 2025
- A scalable approach to resolving variants of uncertain significance
Malvika Tejura, Y P Chen, … Lea M. Starita·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2026
- The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change
Heidi L. Rehm, Joseph T. Alaimo, … Stephen Francis Kingsmore·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2023
- Calibrated Functional Data Decreases Clinical Uncertainty for KCNH2-related Long QT Syndrome
Chai‐Ann Ng, Matthew J. O’Neill, … Brett M. Kroncke·Circulation Genomic and Precision MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2025