Exploring Intuitive Approaches to Protein Conformation Clustering Using Regions of High Structural Variance
Abstract
This paper presents a method to find structurally high variance segments of the different conformations of a single protein and uses clusters them using different distance metrics and interpretation of coordinate and angle data presented by three different methods: root mean squared derivation RMSD, t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) based map, and dihedral-based clustering. The methods were applied on the human cylin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) protein, code P24941 uniprot using a series of python scripts and clustering packages. We test our methods on the data of the CDK2 protein as it is a highly researched protein, with practical applications of clustering in cancer research, crucial in the regulation of the cell-cycle, and has a sizeable amount of experimental data collected on the confirmation structures. While using the distance based root mean squared deviation RMSD provides data of structure to structure dissimilarity between different conformations, a simple RMSD matrix lacks to ability to describe the subsequence-wise in shape and absolute position which could be the main identifying elements for a proteins conformation and state. To make up for this loss we explore an intuitive and more flexible method, able to accept multiple high structural variance segments, which takes coordinate based data, through a series of maps and with the help of t-SNE, and maps each segment as a feature in the clustering matrix. This method, however, would require additional testing on other proteins and modifications to verify its consistency and test its robustness. In the end we explore the pros and cons of the three methods applied on the high structural variance regions. Despite the randomness factor by the t-SNE used in mapping the coordinates to lower dimensions, the coordinate-based approach consistently performed better than the RSMD and dihedral based methods in clustering the three groups of the CDK2 protein kinase. We also found that analyzing only the substructures identified by the high variance detection algorithm consistently provided more distinct clusters with higher multi-class F1 scores.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Searching for Structure: Characterizing the Protein Conformational Landscape with Clustering-based Algorithms
A. C. Macke, J. E. Stump, … R. I. Dima·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2023
- Characterizing Protein Conformational Spaces using Dimensionality Reduction and Algebraic Topology
Arpita Joshi, Nurit Haspel, Eduardo González·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2021
- Explaining Conformational Diversity in Protein Families through Molecular Motions
Valentin Lombard, Sergei Grudinin, Élodie Laine·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2024
- Clustering conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding
R. Appadurai, J. Krishna, … A. Srivastava·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2022
- FunCLAN: A novel and generalisable method for categorising protein complex conformations, measuring their similarities, and solving the chain equivalence problem
Daniel Celis Garza, Joseph I. J. Ellaway, … Sameer S Velankar·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2025
- CADENCE: Clustering Algorithm - Density-based Exploration and Novelty Clustering with Efficiency
Lexin Chen, Daniel R. Roe, Ramón Alain Miranda‐Quintana·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2025