bioRxivBiophysics
Searching for Structure: Characterizing the Protein Conformational Landscape with Clustering-based Algorithms
A. C. Macke, J. E. Stump, M. S. Kelly, J. Rowley, V. Herath, S. Mullen, R. I. Dima
Abstract
The identification and characterization of the main conformations from a protein population is a challenging, inherently high-dimensional problem. We introduce the Secondary sTructural Ensembles with machine LeArning (StELa) double clustering method, which clusters protein structures based on the underlying Ramachandran plot. Our approach takes advantage of the relationship between the phi and psi dihedral angles in a protein backbone and the secondary structure of the protein. The classification of states as vectors composed of the clusters indices arising naturally from the Ramachandran plot, followed by the hierarchical clustering of the vectors, enables the identification of the minima from the corresponding free energy landscape (FEL) by lifting the high structure degeneracy found with existing approaches such as the RMSD-based clustering GROMOS. We compare the performance of StELa with not only GROMOS but also with CATS, the combinatorial averaged transient structure clustering method based on distributions of the phi and psi dihedral angle coordinates. Using ensembles of conformations from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of either intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) of various lengths (tau protein fragments) or from local structures from a globular protein, we show that StELa is the only clustering method that identifies nearly all the minima from the corresponding FELs. In contrast, GROMOS yields a large number of clusters that cover the entire FEL and CATS, even with an additional clustering step, is unable to sample well the FEL for long IDPs and for fragments from globular proteins as it misses important minima. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/557631v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@634f90org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fca966org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d59bd9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1eadb94_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: clustering
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploring Intuitive Approaches to Protein Conformation Clustering Using Regions of High Structural Variance
Yi Yao Tan·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2021
- Characterizing Protein Conformational Spaces using Dimensionality Reduction and Algebraic Topology
Arpita Joshi, Nurit Haspel, Eduardo González·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2021
- Identifying Protein Conformational States in the PDB and Comparison to AlphaFold2 Predictions
Joseph I. J. Ellaway, Stephen Anyango, … Sameer S Velankar·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2023
- ClustENMD: Efficient sampling of biomolecular conformational space at atomic resolution
B. Kaynak, S. Zhang, … P. Doruker·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2021
- A New Clustering and Nomenclature for Beta Turns Derived from High-Resolution Protein Structures
Maxim V. Shapovalov, Slobodan Vučetić, Roland L. Dunbrack·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2019
- ConforFold Recovers Alternative Protein Conformations Beyond MSA Subsampling
Raulia R. Syrlybaeva, Eva‐Maria Strauch·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2026