henhaobio
Sign in

NeuronNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Striatal dopamine explains novelty-induced behavioral dynamics and individual variability in threat prediction

Korleki AkitiiD, Iku Tsutsui‐KimuraiD, Yudi Xie, Alexander MathisiD, Jeffrey E. MarkowitziD, Rockwell AnyohaiD, Sandeep Robert DattaiD, Mackenzie Weygandt MathisiD, Naoshige UchidaiD, Mitsuko Watabe‐UchidaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Animals exhibit diverse behavioral responses, such as exploration and avoidance, to novel cues in the environment. However, it remains unclear how dopamine neuron-related novelty responses influence behavior. Here, we characterized dynamics of novelty exploration using multi-point tracking (DeepLabCut) and behavioral segmentation (MoSeq). Novelty elicits a characteristic sequence of behavior, starting with investigatory approach and culminating in object engagement or avoidance. Dopamine in the tail of striatum (TS) suppresses engagement, and dopamine responses were predictive of individual variability in behavior. Behavioral dynamics and individual variability were explained by a novel reinforcement learning (RL) model of threat prediction, in which behavior arises from a novelty-induced initial threat prediction (akin to "shaping bonus"), and a threat prediction that is learned through dopamine-mediated threat prediction errors. These results uncover an algorithmic similarity between reward- and threat-related dopamine sub-systems. HighlightsO_LINovelty-induced behaviors are analyzed using modern machine-learning methods C_LIO_LINovelty induces risk assessment which develops into engagement or avoidance C_LIO_LIDopamine in the tail of striatum correlates with individual behavioral variability C_LIO_LIReinforcement learning with shaping bonus and uncertainty explains the data C_LI

Citations
100
FWCI
8.83
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISTsutsui‐Kim '25Green '26Möller '20Wang '24Basu '22Kondrakiewi '25
75% semantic matchNeuroscience
Iku Tsutsui‐Kimura, Zhiyu Melissa Tian, Ryunosuke Amo+5 more·Nature Neuroscience·Mar 10, 2025· 65 citations