bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Large-scale multivariate multi-ancestry Interaction analyses point towards different genetic mechanisms by population and exposure.
Vincent LavilleiD, Timothy D. MajarianiD, Yun Ju SungiD, Karen SchwanderiD, Mary Furlan FeitosaiD, Daniel I. ChasmaniD, Amy R. BentleyiD, Charles N. RotimiiD, L. Adrienne CupplesiD, Paul S. de VriesiD, Michael R Brown, Alanna C. MorrisoniD, Aldi T. Kraja, Michael A. ProvinceiD, C. Charles GuiD, James GaudermaniD, D. C. RaoiD, Alisa Knodle ManningiD, Hugues AschardiD, on behalf of the CHARGE Gene-Lifestyle Interactions Working Group
Abstract
The CHARGE Gene-Lifestyle Interactions Working Group is a unique initiative formed to improve our understanding of the role and biological significance of gene-environment interactions in human traits and diseases. The consortium published several multi-ancestry genome-wide interaction studies (GWIS) involving up to 610,475 individuals for three lipids and four blood pressure traits while accounting for interaction effects with drinking and smoking exposures. Here we used GWIS summary statistics from these studies to decipher potential differences in genetic associations and GxE interactions across phenotype-exposure-population trios, and to derive new insights on the potential mechanistic underlying GxE through in-silico functional analyses. Our comparative analysis shows first that interaction effects likely contribute to the commonly reported ancestry-specific genetic effect in complex traits, and second, that some phenotype-exposures pairs are more likely to benefit from a greater detection power when accounting for interactions. It also highlighted a negligible correlation between main and interaction effects, providing material for future methodological development and biological discussions. We also estimated contributions to phenotypic variance, including in particular the genetic heritability conditional on the exposure, and heritability partitioned across a range of functional annotations and cell-types. In these analyses, we found multiple instances of heterogeneity of functional partitions between exposed and unexposed individuals, providing new evidence for likely exposure-specific genetic pathways. Finally, along this work we identified potential biases in methods used to jointly meta-analyses genetic and interaction effects. We performed a series of simulations to characterize these limitations and to provide the community with guideline for future GxE studies.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An Ancestry Based Approach for Detecting Interactions
Danny Park, Itamar Eskin, … Noah Zaitlen·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2017
- A two-step approach to testing overall effect of gene-environment interaction for multiple phenotypes
Arunabha Majumdar, Kathryn S. Burch, … John S. Witte·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2020
- A multivariate approach to joint testing of main genetic and gene-environment interaction effects
Saurabh Mishra, Arunabha Majumdar·bioRxiv·May 6, 2024
- Genetic interactions drive heterogeneity in causal variant effect sizes for gene expression and complex traits
Roshni A. Patel, Shaila A. Musharoff, … Jonathan K. Pritchard·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2022
- Accounting for genetic effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and improving power to detect gene-environment interactions with SharePro
Wenmin Zhang, ROBERT M. SLADEK, … Josée Dupuis·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2024
- A Perspective on Interaction Tests in Genetic Association Studies
Hugues Aschard·bioRxiv·May 22, 2015