Nucleic Acids ResearchBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Stable gene expression for normalisation and single-sample scoring
Dharmesh Dinesh BhuvaiD, Joseph CursonsiD, Melissa J. DavisiD
Abstract
BackgroundTranscriptomic signatures are useful in defining the molecular phenotypes of cells, tissues, and patient samples. Their most successful and widespread clinical application is the stratification of breast cancer patients into molecular (PAM50) subtypes. In most cases, gene expression signatures are developed using transcriptome-wide measurements, thus methods that match signatures to samples typically require a similar degree of measurements. The cost and relatively large amounts of fresh starting material required for whole-transcriptome sequencing has limited clinical applications, and accordingly thousands of existing gene signatures are unexplored in a clinical context. ResultsGenes in a molecular signature can provide information about molecular phenotypes and their underlying transcriptional programs from tissue samples, however determining the transcriptional state of these genes typically requires the measurement of all genes across multiple samples to allow for comparison. An efficient assay and scoring method should quantify the relative abundance of signature genes with a minimal number of additional measurements. We identified genes with stable expression across a range of abundances, and with a preserved relative ordering across large numbers (thousands) of samples, allowing signature scoring, and supporting general data normalisation for transcriptomic data. Based on singscore, we have developed a new method, stingscore, which quantifies and summarises relative expression levels of signature genes from individual samples through the inclusion of these "stably-expressed genes". ConclusionWe show that our proposed list of stable genes has better stability across cancer and normal tissue data than previously proposed stable or housekeeping genes. Additionally, we show that signature scores computed from whole-transcriptome data are comparable to those calculated using only values for signature genes and our panel of stable genes. This new approach to gene expression signature analysis may facilitate the development of panel-type tests for gene expression signatures, thus supporting clinical translation of the powerful insights gained from cancer transcriptomic studies.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 94
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Similarity identification in gene expression patterns as a new approach in phenotype classification
Seyed Ali Madani Tonekaboni, Venkata SK. Manem, … Benjamin Haibe‐Kains·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2017
- Defining a landscape of molecular phenotypes using a simple single sample scoring method
Momeneh Foroutan, Dharmesh Dinesh Bhuva, … Melissa J. Davis·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 6, 2018
- A residual-ratio framework for auditing transcriptomic gene signatures against background expression structure
Ying Zhu, Chenyu Zhang, … Yuda Bi·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2026
- signifinder enables the identification of tumor cell states and cancer expression signatures in bulk, single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data
Stefania Pirrotta, Laura Masatti, … Enrica Calura·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2023
- pysigscore: gene signatures scoring across bulk and single-cell transcriptomics
Tommaso Giacomello, Saveria Mazzara, … Francesca Meteora Buffa·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026
- CanSig: a tool for benchmarking malignant state discovery in single-cell RNA-Seq data
Florian Barkmann, Josephine Yates, … Valentina Boeva·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2022