bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Somatic variant detection using an individual-specific pangenome reference: a case study of a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patient
Elizaveta KulaevaiD, Eline J.M. BertrumsiD, Markus J. van RoosmaleniD, Rico HagelaariD, Lucca L. M. DerksiD, Laurianne TrabutiD, Arianne M. BrandsmaiD, Mark VerheuliD, Matteo BorettoiD, Sjors MiddelkampiD, Pjotr PrinsiD, Ruben van BoxteliD, Andrea GuarracinoiD
Abstract
Background: Reference bias can cause false or missed somatic variant calls, also in clinically relevant genes. Pangenomes aim to reduce this bias, but evidence of their diagnostic benefit is lacking. We tested how an individual-specific pangenome affects somatic variant calling in bulk samples and single cells. Results: We built an individual-specific pangenome from Nanopore assemblies of normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of a child with acute myeloid leukemia. We aligned short-read whole-genome sequencing data of bulk and single-cell samples to hg38 and to the pangenome, and called somatic variants with standard downstream tools after anchoring pangenome alignments to hg38. Single nucleotide variants were mostly shared, while indel calls unique to the pangenome were fewer than those unique to hg38, mostly in repeats. Both approaches detected NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) drivers. The pangenome-based phylogeny showed more parallel branching in comparison to hg38-based tree. The pangenome removed three false-positive PRSS1 variants and, in single cells, frameshift insertion calls next to polyG and polyC repeats. However, surjection to hg38 coordinates split a WT1 driver indel call in a low-complexity region into two separate calls. Validation showed that all somatic structural variant calls, except NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3-ITD, were germline variants or artifacts. Conclusions: The use of individual-specific pangenome led to fewer false-positive indel and driver calls, mainly in repeats and single cells, and changed the branching of the inferred phylogeny. However, surjection artifacts and false-positive somatic structural variants show that pangenome-based results need read-level inspection and validation before clinical use.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The human pangenome reference reduces ancestry-related biases in somatic mutation detection
Chau V.K. Pham, Farida S.A. Abdelmalek, … Kathleen E. Houlahan·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2026
- PanVariants: Best Practice for Pangenome-based Variant Calling Pipeline and Framework
Heng Yi, Linqi Wang, … Ming Ni·bioRxiv·May 17, 2026
- Improving long-read somatic structural variant calling with pangenome and de novo personal genome assembly
Qian Qin, Jakob Heinz, Heng Li·Cancer Research CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Leveraging Human Pangenome for Improved Somatic Variant Detection
- Defining and cataloging variants in pangenome graphs
Pouria Salehi Nowbandegani, Shenghan Zhang, … Luke Jen O’Connor·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2026
- Personalized Pangenome References
Jouni Sirén, Parsa Eskandar, … Benedict Paten·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2024