The number of immune defense and counter-defense systems sustained in the arms race between procaryotes and viruses
Yaroslav IspolatoviD, Anna Lekontseva, Konstantin SeverinoviD
Abstract
Prokaryotes have evolved various mechanisms to counter viruses, which in their turn developed numerous strategies to avoid defenses of the hosts. Dozens of such defense and counter-defense mechanisms have recently been discovered, yet the number of such systems held by a given virus or its host is limited. Here, we present numerical and theoretical arguments for the existence of the maximal number of ecologically and evolutionary sustainable defense and counter-defense systems maintained by both sides at any time of the never-ending evolutionary arms race. We find that the number of such systems is of the order of 10 for a broad range of assumptions about the costs and benefits of defense and counter-defense mechanisms and their specificity. This optimum in the number of defense and counter-defense systems appears as a result of a compromise between the metabolic and autoimmune costs of adding a new layer of defense and the benefits it conveys. 1 Significance statementAlmost all living creatures are either predators or prey (and many are both). At all scales of life, from single cells to largest mammals, prey evolve defenses against predators and predators in their turn evolve counter-defense mechanisms. As a result of this ever-lasting arms race, each organism usually possesses multilayer defense and counter-defense arsenals. Is there a limit to the size of these arsenals? In this work we present a proof-of-principle argument that such a limit indeed exists. Using for definity an example of prokaryotes as the prey and their viruses as predators, we show that the number of distinct defense and counter-defense system that the prey and predators possess is limited by a number of the order of 10 and is only weakly dependent on the ecology of predator-prey interactions. Similar principles and limits likely emerge universally in various antagonistic conflicts such as crime and law enforcement or real arms race.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ecological Determinants of Altruism in Prokaryote Antivirus Defense
Dmitry Biba, Kira S. Makarova, … Nash D. Rochman·Biology DirectPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2025
- Evolution of antivirus defense in prokaryotes depending on the environmental virus prevalence and virome dynamics
S. G. Babajanyan, Sofya K. Garushyants, … Eugene V. Koonin·mBioPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2025
- Bacterial defense and phage counter-defense lead to coexistence in a modeled ecosystem
Ofer Kimchi, Yigal Meir, Ned S. Wingreen·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2024
- Genomic landscape of antiviral defense systems in prokaryotes and phages
Jinquan Li, Jiazheng Gu, … Meng Li·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2024
- High defense system expression broadens protection range at the cost of increased autoimmunity
Nitzan Aframian, Shira Omer Bendori, … Avigdor Eldar·Nature MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2025
- Redefining paradigms in the archaeal virus-host arms race
Laura Martínez-Álvarez, Xu Peng·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2025