Environmental DNA Barcode Sequence Capture: Targeted, PCR-free Sequence Capture for Biodiversity Analysis from Bulk Environmental Samples
Shadi Shokralla, Joel F. GibsoniD, Ian W. KingiD, Donald J. BairdiD, Daniel H. JanzeniD, Winnie HallwachsiD, Mehrdad HajibabaeiiD
Abstract
Environmental DNA analysis using PCR amplified marker genes has been a key application of high-throughput sequencing (HTS). However, PCR bias is a major drawback to gain accurate qualitative and quantitative biodiversity data. We developed a PCR-free approach using enrichment baits for species-specific mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1(COI) DNA barcodes. The sequence capture was tested on species-rich bulk terrestrial and aquatic benthic samples. Hybridization capture recovered an average of 6 and 4.7 more arthropod orders than amplicon sequencing for terrestrial and benthic samples, respectively. For the terrestrial sample, the four most abundant arthropod orders comprised 94.0% of the sample biomass. These same four orders comprised 95.5% and 97.5% of the COI sequences recovered by amplification and capture, respectively. Hybridization capture recovered three arthropod orders that were detected by biomass analysis, but not by amplicon sequencing and two other insect orders that were not detected by either biomass or amplicon methods. These results indicate the advantage of using sequence capture for a more accurate analysis of biodiversity in bulk environmental samples. The protocol can be easily customized to other DNA barcode markers or gene regions of interest for a wide range of taxa or for a specific target group.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 56
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Hybridization baits pull COI barcodes straight out of bulk terrestrial and benthic samples without PCR, recovering several more arthropod orders per sample than amplicon sequencing.
Environmental DNA analysis built on PCR-amplified marker genes is described as a key application of high-throughput sequencing, and the authors call PCR bias a major drawback for accurate qualitative and quantitative biodiversity data. Enrichment baits for cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COI) barcodes drop the amplification step while keeping the same barcode marker, and the protocol is said to transfer to other markers or target groups.
Key results
ShownCapture detected more arthropod orders than amplicon sequencing of the same material, in both habitat types.
Averages of 6 additional arthropod orders for terrestrial samples and 4.7 additional orders for benthic samples, relative to amplicon sequencing. · Abstract
ShownSome orders were visible only through capture: three that biomass analysis found but amplicons missed, and two insect orders that neither biomass nor amplicon analysis picked up.
Reported as counts of orders in the abstract; the orders are not named and no replicate or statistical support is given. · Abstract
ShownIn the terrestrial sample, the four most abundant arthropod orders dominated biomass and made up a similar share of the COI sequences recovered by both amplification and capture.
The four most abundant arthropod orders were 94.0% of sample biomass, and those same orders accounted for 95.5% of amplicon COI sequences and 97.5% of captured COI sequences. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
Hybridization enrichment baits targeting species-specific mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COI) DNA barcodes were used to capture barcode sequences from species-rich bulk samples without any PCR amplification step. Recovery was compared with amplicon sequencing of the same material, and for the terrestrial sample with ordinal composition measured by biomass.
- species-rich bulk terrestrial samples, assessed by hybridization capture, amplicon sequencing and biomass · arthropods
- bulk aquatic benthic samples, assessed by hybridization capture and amplicon sequencing · arthropods
- Methods & tools
- hybridization capture with enrichment baits, amplicon sequencing, high-throughput sequencing, COI DNA barcodes
Limitations (2)
- Sample numbers are not stated and the composition comparison against biomass rests on a single terrestrial sample, so the order-level gains may not generalise. · noted in this summary
- Agreement with biomass is assessed only for the four most abundant orders at ordinal level; nothing in the text addresses rarer taxa, species-level resolution, bait design or cost. · noted in this summary
Who should read:Read this if you measure biodiversity from bulk environmental samples and want to know how PCR-free COI capture compares with amplicon sequencing for recovering arthropod orders.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The bacterial hitchhiker's guide to COI: Universal primer-based COI capture probes fail to exclude bacterial DNA, but 16S capture leaves metazoa behind
Sanni Hintikka, Jeanette E. L. Carlsson, Jens Carlsson·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2022
- COI metabarcoding primer choice affects richness and recovery of indicator taxa in freshwater systems
Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Teresita M. Porter, … Josip Rudar·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2019
- Enhancing DNA metabarcoding performance and applicability with bait capture enrichment and DNA from conservative ethanol
Maïlys Gauthier, Lara Konecny‐Dupré, … Lefébure Tristan·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2019
- Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
Ryan P. Kelly, Andrew Olaf Shelton, Ramón Gallego·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2019
- Targeted hybridization capture enables comprehensive detection of freshwater bioassessment invertebrates from environmental DNA
Joseph M. Craine, John L. Darcy, … Noah Fierer·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2026
- Development of novel PCR primer sets for DNA metabarcoding of aquatic insects, and the discovery of some cryptic species
M. Takenaka, K. Yano, … K. Tojo·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2021