COI metabarcoding primer choice affects richness and recovery of indicator taxa in freshwater systems
Mehrdad HajibabaeiiD, Teresita M. PorteriD, Michael WrightiD, Josip RudariD
Abstract
DNA-based biodiversity analysis has gained major attention due to the use of high throughput sequencing technology in approaches such as mixed community or environmental DNA metabarcoding. Many cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) primer sets are now available for such work. The purpose of this study is to look at how COI primer choice affects the recovery of arthropod richness, beta diversity, and recovery of site indicator taxa in benthos kick-net samples typically used in freshwater biomonitoring. We examine 6 commonly used COI primer sets, on samples collected from 6 freshwater sites. Richness is sensitive to primer choice and the combined use of additional multiple COI amplicons recovers higher richness. Thus, to recover maximum richness, multiple primer sets should be used with COI metabarcoding. Samples consistently cluster by site regardless of amplicon choice or PCR replicate. Thus, for broadscale community analyses, overall beta diversity patterns are robust to COI marker choice. Additionally, the recovery of traditional freshwater bioindicator assemblages such as Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Plectoptera, and Diptera may not fully capture the diversity of broadscale arthropod site indicators that can be recovered from COI metabarcoding. Based on these results, studies that use different COI amplicons may not be directly comparable. This work will help future biodiversity and biomonitoring studies develop not just standardized, but optimized workflows that maximize taxon-detection or order taxa along gradients.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 129
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The bacterial hitchhiker's guide to COI: Universal primer-based COI capture probes fail to exclude bacterial DNA, but 16S capture leaves metazoa behind
Sanni Hintikka, Jeanette E. L. Carlsson, Jens Carlsson·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2022
- How to barcode (almost all) freshwater biodiversity
O. Tournayre, H. Tian, … S. C. Lougheed·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2023
- Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from eDNA through minimized non-target amplification
F. Leese, M. Sander, … V. M. A. Zizka·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2020
- Watered-down biodiversity? A comparison of metabarcoding results from DNA extracted from matched water and bulk tissue biomonitoring samples
M. Hajibabaei, T. Porter, … M. Wright·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2019
- DNA Metabarcoding For High-Throughput Monitoring Of Estuarine Macrobenthic Communities
Jorge Lobo, Shadi Shokralla, … Filipe O. Costa·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2017
- Variations in terrestrial arthropod DNA metabarcoding methods recovers robust beta diversity but variable richness and site indicators based on exact sequence variants
T. M. Porter, D. M. Morris, … L. Venier·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2019