bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Reducing the Risk of Gradient Induced EEG Hardware Heating During Simultaneous EEG-fMRI
Brandon T IngramiD, R Allen WaggoneriD, Makoto UjiiD, Kenichi Ueno, Chisato Suzuki, Fumiaki SatoiD, Xuemei Li, Stephen D MayhewiD, Andrew P BagshawiD, Masako TamakiiD, Karen J MullingeriD
Abstract
Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional MRI (fMRI) has the potential to provide a more complete characterisation of brain function. Acquiring these data simultaneously requires the EEG hardware to be MR safe, since the EEG cap, amplifiers and powerpacks must be located within the MR environment. Placing them in this environment exposes them to both static and varying (radiofrequency (RF) and gradient) magnetic fields, presenting a potential heating risk. Previous studies have typically positioned the amplifiers and powerpacks outside of the bore, meaning that this risk is largely limited to the EEG cap. However, current guidelines recommend positioning the amplifiers within the bore. This reduces the distance between the EEG electrodes and amplifier, improving EEG signal quality and reducing risks of RF heating at the electrodes, but presents a potential heating risk for the amplifiers and powerpacks from the varying magnetic field gradients. In this study, we demonstrate that placing the amplifiers and powerpacks in the bore presents a significant heating risk, both at 7T and 3T. At 7T, we show that EPI sequences with a slew rate of at least 88 T/m/s resulted in significant heating of the EEG amplifiers. This heating effect could be negated by reducing the slew rate to 61 T/m/s. At 3T, we replicate the EEG amplifier heating and show that an alternative approach to reducing the gradient slew rates experience by the hardware is to increase the distance between the EEG amplifier/powerpacks and the isocentre of the magnet. Increasing the distance between the EEG hardware and MR isocentre by 30 cm mitigates the heating risk to the amplifiers and powerpacks, regardless of sequence parameters (e.g., slew rate). Therefore, whilst reducing the distance between the electrodes and amplifiers may improve EEG signal quality and reduce the potential for electrode RF heating, we show that risk of heating of hardware by gradient switching is greatly increased. This is particularly important to consider with the faster gradient slew rates available on modern MRI scanners, desired to increase spatial resolution. Experimenters must make careful decisions about hardware placement to ensure that the EEG-fMRI setup they use is safe, taking account of the varying risks that are posed by different approaches.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI
Maximillian K. Egan, Ryan J. Larsen, … Sepideh Sadaghiani·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2021
- An optimized framework for simultaneous EEG-fMRI at 7T enabling safe, high-quality human brain imaging with millisecond temporal resolution and sub-millimeter spatial resolution
Cristina Sainz Martinez, Jonathan Wirsich, … João Jorge·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2024
- RF Heating of Bipolar Epicardial Implants during MRI at 0.55 T and 1.5T: Effect of Device Length and Termination Conditions
Bhumi Bhusal, Pia Sanpitak, … Laleh Golestanirad·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026
- Data-driven beamforming techniques to attenuate ballistocardiogram (BCG) artefacts in EEG-fMRI without detecting cardiac pulses in electrocardiography (ECG) recordings
Makoto Uji, Nathan E. Cross, … Christophe Grova·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2021
- Variability of EEG electrode positions and their underlying brain regions: visualising gel artifacts from a simultaneous EEG-fMRI dataset
Catriona L. Scrivener, Arran T. Reader·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2022
- Modifying the trajectory of epicardial leads can substantially reduce MRI-induced RF heating in pediatric patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device
F. Jiang, B. Bhusal, … L. Golestanirad·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2022