NatureNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
NEURD offers automated proofreading and feature extraction for connectomics
Brendan CeliiiD, Stelios PapadopoulosiD, Zhuokun DingiD, Paul G. FaheyiD, Eric Y. WangiD, Christos PapadopoulosiD, Alexander B. KuniniD, Saumil Surendra PateliD, J. Alexander BaeiD, Ágnes L. BodoriD, Derrick BrittainiD, JoAnn BuchananiD, Daniel J. BumbargeriD, Manuel CastroiD, Erick Cobos, Sven DorkenwaldiD, Leila ElabbadyiD, Akhilesh HalageriiD, Zhen JiaiD, Chris A. JordaniD, Dan Kapner, Nico KemnitziD, Sam KinniD, Kisuk LeeiD, Kai LiiD, , Jacob ReimeriD
- Citations
- 40
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Abstract
We are now in the era of millimeter-scale electron microscopy (EM) volumes collected at nanometer resolution (Shapson-Coe et al., 2021; Consortium et al., 2021). Dense reconstruction of cellular compartments in these EM volumes has been enabled by recent advances in Machine Learning (ML) (Lee et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2021; Macrina et al., 2021). Automated segmentation methods produce exceptionally accurate reconstructions of cells, but post-hoc proofreading is still required to generate large connectomes free of merge and split errors. The elaborate 3-D meshes of neurons in these volumes contain detailed morphological information at multiple scales, from the diameter, shape, and branching patterns of axons and dendrites, down to the fine-scale structure of dendritic spines. However, extracting these features can require substantial effort to piece together existing tools into custom workflows. Building on existing open-source software for mesh manipulation, here we present "NEURD", a software package that decomposes meshed neurons into compact and extensively-annotated graph representations. With these feature-rich graphs, we automate a variety of tasks such as state of the art automated proofreading of merge errors, cell classification, spine detection, axon-dendritic proximities, and other annotations. These features enable many downstream analyses of neural morphology and connectivity, making these massive and complex datasets more accessible to neuroscience researchers focused on a variety of scientific questions.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accelerated EM Connectome Reconstruction using 3D Visualization and Segmentation Graphs
Philip M. Hubbard, Stuart Berg, … Stephen M. Plaza·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2020
- A Novel Semi-automated Proofreading and Mesh Error Detection Pipeline for Neuron Extension
Justin Joyce, Rupasri Chalavadi, … Brock A. Wester·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2023
- Learning cellular morphology with neural networks
Philipp J. Schubert, Sven Dorkenwald, … Joergen M. R. Kornfeld·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2019
- Neuronal Subcompartment Classification and Merge Error Correction
Hanyu Li, Michał Januszewski, … Peter H. Li·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Accelerating Neuron Reconstruction with PATHFINDER
Michał Januszewski, Thomas Templier, … Harald F. Hess·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- neuPrint: Analysis Tools for EM Connectomics
Jody Clements, Tom Dolafi, … Stephen M. Plaza·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2020