eLifeGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Regulatory genome annotation of 33 insect species
Hasiba AsmaiD, Ellen Tieke, Kevin D. DeemiD, Jabale RahmatiD, Tiffany Dong, Xinbo Huang, Yoshinori TomoyasuiD, Marc S. HalfoniD
Abstract
Annotation of newly-sequenced genomes frequently includes genes, but rarely covers important non-coding genomic features such as the cis-regulatory modules--e.g., enhancers and silencers--that regulate gene expression. Here, we begin to remedy this situation by developing a workflow for rapid initial annotation of insect regulatory sequences, and provide a searchable database resource with enhancer predictions for 33 genomes. Using our previously-developed SCRMshaw computational enhancer prediction method, we predict over 2.8 million regulatory sequences along with the tissues where they are expected to be active, in a set of insect species ranging over 360 million years of evolution. Extensive analysis and validation of the data provides several lines of evidence suggesting that we achieve a high true-positive rate for enhancer prediction. One, we show that our predictions target specific loci, rather than random genomic locations. Two, we predict enhancers in orthologous loci across a diverged set of species to a significantly higher degree than random expectation would allow. Three, we demonstrate that our predictions are highly enriched for regions of accessible chromatin. Four, we achieve a validation rate in excess of 70% using in vivo reporter gene assays. As we continue to annotate both new tissues and new species, our regulatory annotation resource will provide a rich source of data for the research community and will have utility for both small-scale (single gene, single species) and large-scale (many genes, many species) studies of gene regulation. In particular, the ability to search for functionally-related regulatory elements in orthologous loci should greatly facilitate studies of enhancer evolution even among distantly related species.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 9
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- EnhancerDetector: Enhancer Discovery from Human to Fly via Interpretable Deep Learning
Luis M. Solis, Geyenna Sterling-Lentsch, … Hani Z. Girgis·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy
Hamutal Arbel, Sumanta Basu, … James B. Brown·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2018
- The Sheep and the Goats: Distinguishing transcriptional enhancers in a complex chromatin landscape
Anne Sonnenschein, Ian M. Dworkin, David N. Arnosti·bioRxiv·May 25, 2018
- EnhancerP-2L: A Gene regulatory site identification tool for DNA enhancer region using CREs motifs
Ahmad Hassan Butt, Salem Alkhalaf, … Yaser Daanial Khan·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2020
- Characterisation of cis-regulatory elements and genome wide enhancer prediction in Heliconiini butterflies
Adam D Ritchie, Francesco Cicconardi, Stephen Hugh Montgomery·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2026
- Genome-Wide Prediction of cis-Regulatory Regions Using Supervised Deep Learning Methods
Yifeng Li, Wenqiang Shi, Wyeth W Wasserman·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2016